Jo Rose

33 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Jo Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Safety Research 82
  • General Decision Sciences 18
  • Education 185
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
  • Public Administration 17
Replace Kenneth Gray with:
Kenneth Gray United States
Per Lindqvist Sweden
Anne C. Lewis United Kingdom
Martha Abele Mac Iver United States
Mihajla Gavin Australia
Sharon Ravitch United States
Karen Hunter Quartz United States
Kristen C. Wilcox United States
Curt M. Adams United States
Philip Wing Keung Chan Australia
Jo Rose relative to Kenneth Gray United States Kenneth Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Kenneth Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Rose. The network helps show where Jo Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jo Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Rose Line = papers co-authored together Jo Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200776
2 201851
3 200946
4 201825
5 200822
6
Research Learning Communities: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary.
201720
7 201319
8 201318
9 202114
10 20149
11 20078
12 20126
13
Finding ‘mathematics’: parents questioning school-centred approaches to involvement in children’s mathematics learning
20175
14 20124
15 20194
16 20224
17
Making the Difference: Ethnicity and Achievement in Bristol Schools
20124
18 20194
19 20174
20 20183

About Jo Rose

Jo Rose is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (6 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (82 citations), General Decision Sciences (18 citations), Education (185 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations) and Public Administration (17 citations). Jo Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Colman, Briony D. Pulford, Tim Jay, Ben Simmons, Jo‐Anne Baird, Brahm Norwich, Shelley McKeown, A. S. Edwards, Sally Thomas and Liz Todd. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Research & Method in Education, Acta Psychologica, International Journal of Management in Education, Journal of Social Issues and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact