Anne C. Lewis
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (22 papers)Education Systems and Policy (20 papers)School Choice and Performance (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anne C. Lewis
72 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Education 303
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 64
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- Safety Research 49
- Clinical Psychology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Anne C. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne C. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne C. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne C. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne C. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne C. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne C. Lewis. The network helps show where Anne C. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne C. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne C. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne C. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne C. Lewis. Anne C. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | WASHINGTON COMMENTARY: Unwrapping Teaching | 1 |
| 2 | WASHINGTON COMMENTARY: Redefining 'Inexcusable' | 1 |
| 3 | From Universal Access to Universal Proficiency. | 3 |
| 4 | Middle-Grades Reform. | 3 |
| 5 | Time to Remember the OForgotten Half | 1 |
| 6 | Washington Commentary: Time for Schools to Perform | 1 |
| 7 | Higher Education Act Takes on Teacher Preparation | 1 |
| 8 | Seeking Connection through Character | 1 |
| 9 | Growing Hispanic Enrollments: Challenge and Opportunity | 1 |
| 10 | Staying with the Standards Movement | 2 |
| 11 | Enabling All Students to Learn | 2 |
| 12 | Words about the Future | 2 |
| 13 | Questions and Answers about School Leadership | 3 |
| 14 | Learning from Experience | 1 |
| 15 | Goals 2000 Is Not More of the Same | 2 |
| 16 | Making Collaboration Happen | 3 |
| 17 | Reinventing Congress: Starting from Scratch | 1 |
| 18 | The Payoff from a Quality Preschool | 1 |
| 19 | The South Carolina Teacher Cadet Program. | 4 |
| 20 | The Not So Extracurriculum. Kappan Special Report. | 1 |
About Anne C. Lewis
Anne C. Lewis is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 120 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (22 papers), Education Systems and Policy (20 papers) and School Choice and Performance (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (303 citations), Safety Research (49 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations). Anne C. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brahm Norwich, Anne T. Henderson, John Norton, Nancy Protheroe and Charles T. Meadow. Their work appears in journals such as British Educational Research Journal, Educational leadership and Phi Delta Kappan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.