Andrew M. Colman

8.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
141 papers, 5.4k citations indexed

About

Andrew M. Colman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew M. Colman has authored 141 papers receiving a total of 5.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 45 papers in Safety Research and 24 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew M. Colman's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (45 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (31 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (24 papers). Andrew M. Colman is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (45 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (31 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (24 papers). Andrew M. Colman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Andrew M. Colman's co-authors include Briony D. Pulford, Claire E. Norris, Natalie Gold, Eva M. Krockow, Carolyn Tarrant, David J. Hargreaves, W. Sluckin, David K. Smith, Lindsay Browning and Jo Rose and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American Statistical Association.

In The Last Decade

Andrew M. Colman

133 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences

2000 1.4k citations Andrew M. Colman et al. Acta Psychologica profile →

Peers

Andrew M. Colman

SPS

SR

SP

CN

ECP

John S. Carroll United States

Hal R. Arkes United States

Ulrich Hoffrage Germany

Ola Svenson Sweden

William P. Bottom United States

Richard P. Larrick United States

Jonathan Baron United States

J. Frank Yates United States

Katherine L. Milkman United States

William D. Schafer United States

John S. Carroll United States

Andrew M. Colman

1.9k ×1.1

SPS

361 ×0.4

SR

1.0k ×1.2

SP

554 ×0.9

CN

481 ×0.9

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Andrew M. Colman Andrew M. Colman (= 1×) peers John S. Carroll

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Colman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Colman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Colman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Colman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Colman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Colman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Colman. The network helps show where Andrew M. Colman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew M. Colman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew M. Colman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew M. Colman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew M. Colman. Andrew M. Colman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Colman, Andrew M.. (2024). Facts, Fallacies and Frauds in Psychology.

2.

Shteynberg, Garriy, Jacob B. Hirsh, Wouter Wolf, et al.. (2023). Theory of collective mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 27(11). 1019–1031. 25 indexed citations

3.

Krockow, Eva M., Carolyn Tarrant, & Andrew M. Colman. (2021). Prosociality in the social dilemma of antibiotic prescribing. Current Opinion in Psychology. 44. 164–169. 13 indexed citations

4.

Tarrant, Carolyn, Eva M. Krockow, Andrew M. Colman, et al.. (2020). Moral and Contextual Dimensions of “Inappropriate” Antibiotic Prescribing in Secondary Care: A Three-Country Interview Study. Frontiers in Sociology. 5. 7–7. 37 indexed citations

5.

Colman, Andrew M., Eva M. Krockow, Edmund Chattoe‐Brown, & Carolyn Tarrant. (2019). Medical prescribing and antibiotic resistance: A game-theoretic analysis of a potentially catastrophic social dilemma. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0215480–e0215480. 24 indexed citations

6.

Krockow, Eva M., et al.. (2018). Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation. Judgment and Decision Making. 13(1). 61–72. 1 indexed citations

7.

Colman, Andrew M., Briony D. Pulford, & Eva M. Krockow. (2018). Persistent cooperation and gender differences in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games: Some things never change. Acta Psychologica. 187. 1–8. 10 indexed citations

8.

Pulford, Briony D., Andrew M. Colman, Eike Kofi Buabang, & Eva M. Krockow. (2018). The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 147(10). 1431–1444. 23 indexed citations

9.

Gold, Natalie & Andrew M. Colman. (2018). Team Reasoning and the Rational Choice of Payoff-Dominant Outcomes in Games. Topoi. 39(2). 305–316. 17 indexed citations

10.

Colman, Andrew M. & Natalie Gold. (2017). Team reasoning: Solving the puzzle of coordination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 25(5). 1770–1783. 29 indexed citations

11.

Rapoport, Amnon, Darryl A. Seale, & Andrew M. Colman. (2015). Is Tit-for-Tat the Answer? On the Conclusions Drawn from Axelrod's Tournaments. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0134128–e0134128. 18 indexed citations

12.

Gold, Natalie, et al.. (2011). Commentary/Elqayam & Evans: Subtracting “ought” from “is”. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 1 indexed citations

13.

Colman, Andrew M., Lindsay Browning, & Briony D. Pulford. (2011). Spontaneous similarity discrimination in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 299. 162–171. 23 indexed citations

14.

Colman, Andrew M., et al.. (2010). Learning to cooperate without awareness in multiplayer minimal social situations. Cognitive Psychology. 61(3). 201–227. 11 indexed citations

15.

Colman, Andrew M. & Lindsay Browning. (2009). Evolution of cooperative turn-taking. Evolutionary ecology research. 11(6). 949–963. 16 indexed citations

16.

Browning, Lindsay & Andrew M. Colman. (2004). Evolution of coordinated alternating reciprocity in repeated dyadic games. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 229(4). 549–557. 46 indexed citations

17.

Colman, Andrew M.. (2003). Depth of strategic reasoning in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7(1). 2–4. 25 indexed citations

18.

Colman, Andrew M.. (1995). Psychological research methods and statistics. Longman eBooks. 5 indexed citations

19.

Mackintosh, N. J. & Andrew M. Colman. (1995). Learning and skills. Longman eBooks. 9 indexed citations

20.

Colman, Andrew M.. (1995). Applications of psychology. Longman eBooks. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact