Janice Fournier

13 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Janice Fournier
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Education 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • Sociology and Political Science 58
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 49
  • Social Psychology 38
Replace Carrie Lobman with:
Carrie Lobman United States
Rebecca Hun Ping Cheung Hong Kong
Lyndon C. Martin Canada
Enikő Orsolya Bereczki Hungary
Yu-sien Lin
Mariale M. Hardiman United States
Song A. An United States
Cecilia Wallerstedt Sweden
Francine Smolucha United States
Jonathan Savage United Kingdom
Janice Fournier relative to Carrie Lobman United States Carrie Lobman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carrie Lobman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Fournier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Fournier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Fournier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Fournier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Fournier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Fournier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Fournier. The network helps show where Janice Fournier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Fournier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Fournier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Fournier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Fournier. Janice Fournier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Active Learning in Odegaard Library Report on Year 1 of UW’s First Active Learning Classrooms
1
2 130
3
Rethinking Campus Computing: Understanding Students' Technology and Space Needs
2
4 2
5
The Journey to Best Practices: Results of a Two-Year Study of e-Portfolio Implementation in Beginning Composition Courses
5
6
The Rural Girls in Science Program.
1
7
Using a digital video annotation tool to teach dance composition
22
8 2
9 7
10 25
11
Contextualized thinking in history
30
12 1
13 38

About Janice Fournier

Janice Fournier is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Computer Science Applications and Music, having authored 13 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (36 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (35 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations). Janice Fournier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sam Wineburg, Susan Bobbitt Nolen, Theresa A. Thorkildsen, Reed Stevens, A. Susan Jurow, Ronald A. Beghetto, Jürgen Kurtz, Pamela Burnard, R. Keith Sawyer and Lyndon C. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Educational leadership and American Journal of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026