Jane Pearce

864 total citations
16 papers, 518 citations indexed

About

Jane Pearce is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Pearce has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 518 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jane Pearce's work include Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Jane Pearce is often cited by papers focused on Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Jane Pearce collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Jane Pearce's co-authors include Barry Down, Chad Morrison, Judy Peters, Anna Sullivan, Janet Hunter, Bruce Johnson, Rosie Le Cornu, David P. Ausubel and W. Cumming-Potvin and has published in prestigious journals such as American Sociological Review, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Teachers and Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Jane Pearce

16 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Jane Pearce
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Education 334
  • Clinical Psychology 177
  • Social Psychology 97
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
  • Safety Research 84
Replace Monica R. Brown with:
Monica R. Brown United States
Elina Saeki United States
Margarida César Portugal
Tuomo Virtanen Finland
Raija Pirttimaa Finland
Melissa Newberry United States
Faye McCallum Australia
Kathleen M. Collins United States
Marietjie Oswald South Africa
Andy Miller United Kingdom
Monica R. Brown United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jane Pearce
Jane Pearce · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jane Pearce
Jane Pearce · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Pearce. The network helps show where Jane Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Pearce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Pearce. Jane Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 25
3 1
4 7
5 158
6 12
7 105
8 95
9 19
10 1
11
Conditions that support early career teacher resilience
20
12
Lost in transmission: Using study groups to provide space for creativity and reflexivity in an instrumentalist university environment
1
13 29
14
Identity and Pedagogy: Critical Reflections on Teaching in a University
2
15 17
16 21

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026