James F. Johnson

32 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

James F. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Information Systems and Management 325
  • General Health Professions 157
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 134
  • Education 133
  • Sociology and Political Science 93
Replace Lauren N. Harkrider with:
Lauren N. Harkrider United States
Tyler J. Mulhearn United States
Vykinta Kligyte United States
Gwen E. Jones United States
Liora Pedhazur Schmelkin United States
Matthew T. Luth United States
Peter J. Dean United States
Brian Richardson United States
Herman Steensma Netherlands
Aaron U. Bolin United States
James F. Johnson relative to Lauren N. Harkrider United States Lauren N. Harkrider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lauren N. Harkrider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James F. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Johnson. The network helps show where James F. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Johnson. James F. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 20
3 9
4 20
5 11
6 15
7
The effect of leader moral disengagement and influence tactics on follower cognitions and ethical sensemaking
2
8 47
9
Improving Case-Based Learning with Clear Content and Simple Presentation
2
10 3
11 13
12 16
13 49
14 40
15 90
16 5
17
Human nature in British novels of the longer Nineteenth Century: Doing the math
2
18 2
19
Design assistant: a HyperCard tool for courseware development
2
20 6

About James F. Johnson

James F. Johnson is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Safety Research, having authored 32 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (325 citations), Safety Research (84 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (92 citations). James F. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhanna Bagdasarov, Michael D. Mumford, Shane Connelly, Lauren N. Harkrider, Chase E. Thiel, Lynn D. Devenport, M. Ronald Buckley, Alexandra E. MacDougall, Logan M. Steele and Laura G. Barron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Ethics and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026