Matthew T. Luth
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Douglas R. MayCatherine E. SchwoererCarol FlinchbaughPingshu LiClint ChadwickDonald J. SchepkerCarlos Martin‐RiosJason Bolton
- Topics
- Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Information Systems and ManagementOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementSocial Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Matthew T. Luth
11 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 123
- Information Systems and Management 123
- Social Psychology 104
- General Health Professions 66
- Cognitive Neuroscience 56
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew T. Luth
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew T. Luth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew T. Luth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew T. Luth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew T. Luth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew T. Luth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew T. Luth. The network helps show where Matthew T. Luth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew T. Luth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew T. Luth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew T. Luth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew T. Luth. Matthew T. Luth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 150 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | Final Report of the University of Kansas Initiative in Ethics Education in Science and Engineering | 4 |
About Matthew T. Luth
Matthew T. Luth is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Applied Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (123 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (123 citations) and Social Psychology (104 citations). Matthew T. Luth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Douglas R. May, Catherine E. Schwoerer, Carol Flinchbaugh, Pingshu Li, Clint Chadwick, Donald J. Schepker, Carlos Martin‐Rios, Jason Bolton, Niclas Erhardt and Joshua L. Rosenbloom. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Sustainability and Psychology of sport and exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.