Cheryl K. Stenmark
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael D. MumfordAlison L. AntesChase E. ThielXiaoqian WangJay J. CaughronShane ConnellyLaura E. MartinLynn D. Devenport
- Topics
- Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Leadership QuarterlyJournal of Applied Social PsychologyJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatvia
In The Last Decade
Cheryl K. Stenmark
23 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Information Systems and Management 155
- Cognitive Neuroscience 99
- Social Psychology 73
- General Health Professions 63
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 52
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl K. Stenmark
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl K. Stenmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl K. Stenmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl K. Stenmark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl K. Stenmark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl K. Stenmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl K. Stenmark. The network helps show where Cheryl K. Stenmark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl K. Stenmark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl K. Stenmark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl K. Stenmark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl K. Stenmark. Cheryl K. Stenmark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Cheryl K. Stenmark
Cheryl K. Stenmark is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 26 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (155 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations). Cheryl K. Stenmark has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Alison L. Antes, Chase E. Thiel, Xiaoqian Wang, Jay J. Caughron, Shane Connelly, Laura E. Martin, Lynn D. Devenport, Katherine Riley and Zhanna Bagdasarov. Their work appears in journals such as The Leadership Quarterly, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.