Helen Dixon

955 citations
43 papers · 589 indexed · h-index 15

Helen Dixon

40 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Helen Dixon
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Education 478
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 124
  • Language and Linguistics 92
  • Literature and Literary Theory 76
  • Information Systems and Management 40
Replace Eleanor Hawe with:
Eleanor Hawe New Zealand
Kathryn B. Chval United States
Annie Y.N. Cheng Hong Kong
Jenni Ingram United Kingdom
Joelle K. Jay United States
Shahab Moradkhani Iran
Cynthia Groff Netherlands
Fiona Ell New Zealand
Hamsa Venkat South Africa
Julia Aguirre United States
Helen Dixon relative to Eleanor Hawe New Zealand Eleanor Hawe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Eleanor Hawe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Dixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Dixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Dixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Dixon. The network helps show where Helen Dixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Helen Dixon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Dixon Line = papers co-authored together Helen Dixon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20242
3 202325
4 202214
5 20212
6 202142
7
How Are Undergraduate Students Supervised? Perceptions of Students and Supervisors in a Malaysian University.
20203
8 20203
9 202014
10
Creating the Climate and Space for Peer Review within the Writing Classroom
20176
11
Teacher narratives as theorisation of teaching: A Chinese teacher's perspectives on communicative language teaching (CLT)
20165
12 20161
13 20161
14 20159
15 20137
16 20114
17 201143
18
Oral Feedback in the Context of Written Language
200824
19 20079
20 20001

About Helen Dixon

Helen Dixon is a scholar working on Education, Language and Linguistics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (25 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (12 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (12 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (478 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 citations) and Language and Linguistics (92 citations). Helen Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eleanor Hawe, Lawrence Jun Zhang, Mavis Haigh, Gillian Ward, Judy M. Parr, Richard Hamilton, Mary Hill, Jill Murray, Ruth Williams and Helen Hedges. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Frontiers in Psychology and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026