Hayley Jach

45 total papers · 720 total citations
19 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Hayley Jach is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Hayley Jach has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Hayley Jach's work include Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Hayley Jach is often cited by papers focused on Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Hayley Jach collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Japan. Hayley Jach's co-authors include Luke D. Smillie, Daniel Loton, Lea Waters, Jessie Sun, Tan‐Chyuan Chin, Colin G. DeYoung, Kou Murayama, Daniel Feuerriegel, Lisa Bardach and Gavin R. Slemp and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Hayley Jach

17 papers receiving 356 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Hayley Jach	128	122	121	74	59	19	368
Mia W. Biran	131 1.0×	181 1.5×	72 0.6×	40 0.5×	64 1.1×	15	341
John J. Hedl	88 0.7×	121 1.0×	93 0.8×	38 0.5×	76 1.3×	24	387
Michael A. DeDonno	79 0.6×	117 1.0×	59 0.5×	47 0.6×	48 0.8×	23	352
Tony Gutentag	106 0.8×	155 1.3×	158 1.3×	37 0.5×	63 1.1×	20	386
Martina Klicperová‐Baker	100 0.8×	83 0.7×	106 0.9×	55 0.7×	55 0.9×	28	340
Eran Magen	99 0.8×	96 0.8×	117 1.0×	67 0.9×	60 1.0×	11	400
Kunio Shiomi	78 0.6×	123 1.0×	168 1.4×	38 0.5×	64 1.1×	34	389
Gili Freedman	91 0.7×	101 0.8×	201 1.7×	78 1.1×	88 1.5×	29	381
Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek	76 0.6×	96 0.8×	119 1.0×	41 0.6×	91 1.5×	19	342
W. Pitt Derryberry	92 0.7×	66 0.5×	96 0.8×	69 0.9×	73 1.2×	22	356

Countries citing papers authored by Hayley Jach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hayley Jach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hayley Jach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hayley Jach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hayley Jach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hayley Jach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hayley Jach. The network helps show where Hayley Jach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hayley Jach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hayley Jach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hayley Jach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hayley Jach. Hayley Jach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact