Luke D. Smillie

6.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
120 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Luke D. Smillie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke D. Smillie has authored 120 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Clinical Psychology, 44 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 43 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Luke D. Smillie's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (27 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (26 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (23 papers). Luke D. Smillie is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (27 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (26 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (23 papers). Luke D. Smillie collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Luke D. Smillie's co-authors include Chris J. Jackson, Kun Zhao, Alan D. Pickering, Andrew Cooper, Sharon Horwood, Rosario J. Marrero, Jeromy Anglim, Joshua K Wood, Hayley Jach and Len Dalgleish and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Luke D. Smillie

110 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from p... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luke D. Smillie Australia 35 1.7k 1.4k 1.3k 1.1k 844 120 3.9k
Dustin Albert United States 16 1.4k 0.8× 760 0.5× 792 0.6× 701 0.7× 713 0.8× 19 3.4k
K. Paige Harden United States 47 2.4k 1.4× 2.2k 1.5× 1.0k 0.8× 733 0.7× 535 0.6× 158 6.5k
Mónica Rodríguez United States 18 1.4k 0.9× 973 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 783 0.7× 981 1.2× 34 4.3k
Wouter van den Bos Netherlands 36 921 0.6× 918 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 1.7k 1.7× 450 0.5× 98 3.9k
Thomas F. Denson Australia 38 1.7k 1.0× 1.6k 1.2× 1.9k 1.5× 958 0.9× 648 0.8× 110 4.9k
Rainer Riemann Germany 40 3.0k 1.8× 2.4k 1.7× 1.5k 1.2× 437 0.4× 713 0.8× 114 5.3k
Jennifer S. Beer United States 32 984 0.6× 1.4k 1.0× 2.0k 1.6× 2.5k 2.4× 503 0.6× 61 5.1k
Bernd Figner Netherlands 20 804 0.5× 875 0.6× 492 0.4× 1.2k 1.1× 752 0.9× 58 3.1k
Emily B. Falk United States 39 825 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 1.0× 1.7k 1.7× 1.2k 1.4× 145 5.0k
Frank M. Spinath Germany 46 2.3k 1.4× 3.2k 2.3× 1.8k 1.4× 748 0.7× 531 0.6× 163 7.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Luke D. Smillie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke D. Smillie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke D. Smillie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke D. Smillie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke D. Smillie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke D. Smillie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke D. Smillie. The network helps show where Luke D. Smillie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke D. Smillie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke D. Smillie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke D. Smillie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke D. Smillie. Luke D. Smillie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hopwood, Christopher J., et al.. (2025). Big Five personality traits and voting: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and mega-analysis. European Journal of Personality.
3.
Bleidorn, Wiebke, et al.. (2025). Personality traits and traditional philanthropy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 129(2). 363–383.
5.
Smillie, Luke D., Thomas Frazier, Antonio Y. Hardan, et al.. (2024). Characterising Insistence on Sameness and Circumscribed Interests: A Qualitative Study of Parent Perspectives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 55(8). 2896–2908. 2 indexed citations
6.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2023). Where the Head Meets the Heart: ‘Enlightened’ Compassion Lies Between Big Five Openness/Intellect and Agreeableness. Collabra Psychology. 9(1). 4 indexed citations
7.
Smillie, Luke D., Thomas Frazier, Antonio Y. Hardan, et al.. (2023). Profiles of circumscribed interests in autistic youth. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 17. 1037967–1037967. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wilt, Joshua A., et al.. (2023). Why is authenticity associated with being and acting extraverted? Exploring the mediating role of positive affect. Self and Identity. 22(6). 896–931. 2 indexed citations
9.
Smillie, Luke D., et al.. (2023). Differential responses to ethical vegetarian appeals: Exploring the role of traits, beliefs, and motives. Journal of Personality. 92(3). 800–819. 7 indexed citations
10.
Smillie, Luke D., Thomas Frazier, Antonio Y. Hardan, et al.. (2022). Characterizing restricted and unusual interests in autistic youth. Autism Research. 16(2). 394–405. 5 indexed citations
11.
Haslam, Nick & Luke D. Smillie. (2022). An Introduction to Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 4 indexed citations
12.
Ludeke, Steven G., et al.. (2022). Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 122(4). 749–777. 69 indexed citations
14.
Ludeke, Steven G., et al.. (2021). Evaluating the Big Five as an Organizing Framework for Commonly Used Psychological Trait Scales. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 4 indexed citations
15.
Koval, Peter, et al.. (2020). When Good Feelings Turn Mixed: Affective Dynamics and Big Five Trait Predictors of Mixed Emotions in Daily Life. European Journal of Personality. 34(3). 393–411. 17 indexed citations
16.
Anglim, Jeromy, Sharon Horwood, Luke D. Smillie, Rosario J. Marrero, & Joshua K Wood. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.. Psychological Bulletin. 146(4). 279–323. 461 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Smillie, Luke D., et al.. (2019). Extraversion and reward-processing: Consolidating evidence from an electroencephalographic index of reward-prediction-error. Biological Psychology. 146. 107735–107735. 26 indexed citations
18.
Ludeke, Steven G., et al.. (2019). Using the Big Five Aspect Scales to translate between the HEXACO and Big Five personality models. Journal of Personality. 87(5). 1025–1038. 30 indexed citations
19.
Sun, Jessie, Scott Barry Kaufman, & Luke D. Smillie. (2016). Unique Associations Between Big Five Personality Aspects and Multiple Dimensions of Well‐Being. Journal of Personality. 86(2). 158–172. 90 indexed citations
20.
Smillie, Luke D., et al.. (2001). Judgement and Decision-Making Performance in Personnel Selection: Partial Feedback and the Role of Confidence. Australian Journal of Psychology. 53. 175–175. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026