Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Mariola ŁagunaAnna OleszkiewiczAgnieszka SorokowskaKatarzyna PisanskiMichał PieniakMaciej KarwowskiThomas HummelMonika Wróbel
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
18 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Social Psychology 123
- Clinical Psychology 98
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
This map shows the geographic impact of Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek. The network helps show where Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek. Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | Beliefs in having fixed or malleable traits and willingness to help: Implicit theories and sequential social influence techniques | 1 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | Implicit theories and compliance with the foot-in-the-door technique | 3 |
| 20 | Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga – polska adaptacja metody | 150 |
About Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek
Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (36 citations), Social Psychology (123 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations). Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Mariola Łaguna, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Katarzyna Pisanski, Michał Pieniak, Maciej Karwowski, Thomas Hummel, Monika Wróbel, Michał Stefańczyk and Michał Białek. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Motivation and Emotion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.