This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Spooner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Spooner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Spooner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Spooner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Spooner. The network helps show where Fred Spooner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Spooner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Spooner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Spooner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Spooner. Fred Spooner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Courtade, Ginevra R., Fred Spooner, Diane M. Browder, & Bree Jimenez. (2012). Seven Reasons to Promote Standards-Based Instruction for Students with Severe Disabilities: A Reply to Ayres, Lowrey, Douglas, & Sievers (2011). Education and training in autism and developmental disabilities. 47(1). 3–13.55 indexed citations
Algozzine, Bob, et al.. (2010). Multi-Method Evaluation of College Teaching. Journal on excellence in college teaching. 21(1). 27–49.2 indexed citations
Flowers, Claudia, et al.. (2001). Comparison of Student Rating of Instruction in Distance Education and Traditional Courses. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2001(1). 2314–2319.2 indexed citations
12.
Spooner, Fred, et al.. (1993). An examination of classic articles in the education of persons with severe disabilities.. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 28(1). 23–29.2 indexed citations
13.
Spooner, Fred, et al.. (1991). Classic articles: A reflection into the field of mental retardation.. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 26(2).7 indexed citations
Spooner, Fred. (1989). Teaching First Aid Skills to Adolescents Who Are Moderately Mentally Handicapped.. Education and training in mental retardation. 24(4).27 indexed citations
16.
Spooner, Fred, et al.. (1987). Peer Review in the Institutional Setting: An Analysis of Process and Outcome.. Education and training in mental retardation. 22(1). 26–34.1 indexed citations
17.
Spooner, Fred. (1986). Comparisons of Modified Backward Chaining: Backward Chaining with Leap-Aheads and Reverse Chaining with Leap-Aheads.. Education and Treatment of Children. 9(2).5 indexed citations
18.
Spooner, Fred, et al.. (1984). A Review of Chaining Techniques: Implications for Future Research and Practice.. Education and training of the mentally retarded. 19(2).28 indexed citations
19.
Spooner, Fred. (1984). Comparisons of Backward Chaining and Total Task Presentation in Training Severely Handicapped Persons.. Education and training of the mentally retarded. 19(1). 15–22.14 indexed citations
20.
Spooner, Fred. (1983). The Effects of Backward Chaining and Total Task Presentation on the Acquisition of Complex Tasks by Severely Retarded Adolescents and Adults.. Education and Treatment of Children. 6(4).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.