Fou-Lai Lin

740 total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 414 citations indexed

About

Fou-Lai Lin is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fou-Lai Lin has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 414 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Education, 7 papers in Statistics and Probability and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Fou-Lai Lin's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (13 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers). Fou-Lai Lin is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (13 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers). Fou-Lai Lin collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and Israel. Fou-Lai Lin's co-authors include Michelle Stephan, Koeno Gravemeijer, Cyril Julie, Minoru Ohtani, Kai‐Lin Yang, Rooselyna Ekawati, Reuven Babai, Pessia Tsamir, Ruth Stavy and Campbell J. McRobbie and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Studies in Mathematics, ZDM and International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

In The Last Decade

Fou-Lai Lin

19 papers receiving 386 citations

Hit Papers

What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the S... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fou-Lai Lin Taiwan 9 333 99 93 81 46 19 414
Minoru Ohtani Japan 4 282 0.8× 88 0.9× 77 0.8× 69 0.9× 38 0.8× 5 343
Mohan Chinnappan Australia 15 504 1.5× 85 0.9× 146 1.6× 102 1.3× 27 0.6× 55 565
Cengiz Alacacı Türkiye 12 336 1.0× 67 0.7× 79 0.8× 77 1.0× 24 0.5× 26 404
Kai‐Lin Yang Taiwan 10 246 0.7× 58 0.6× 84 0.9× 84 1.0× 36 0.8× 38 319
Manuel Santos‐Trigo Mexico 11 286 0.9× 61 0.6× 110 1.2× 110 1.4× 28 0.6× 32 359
Keith R. Leatham United States 14 632 1.9× 54 0.5× 204 2.2× 177 2.2× 37 0.8× 41 716
Max Stephens Australia 11 481 1.4× 70 0.7× 207 2.2× 112 1.4× 23 0.5× 60 595
Christine Larson United States 14 429 1.3× 44 0.4× 96 1.0× 143 1.8× 39 0.8× 33 539
Monica Wijers Netherlands 8 207 0.6× 54 0.5× 58 0.6× 86 1.1× 82 1.8× 14 315
Stephen John Norton Australia 11 297 0.9× 48 0.5× 73 0.8× 60 0.7× 34 0.7× 47 364

Countries citing papers authored by Fou-Lai Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fou-Lai Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fou-Lai Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fou-Lai Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fou-Lai Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fou-Lai Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fou-Lai Lin. The network helps show where Fou-Lai Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fou-Lai Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fou-Lai Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fou-Lai Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fou-Lai Lin. Fou-Lai Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Strohmaier, Anselm, et al.. (2019). Comparing eye movements during mathematical word problem solving in Chinese and German. ZDM. 52(1). 45–58. 6 indexed citations
2.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2018). Description and evaluation of a large-scale project to facilitate student engagement in learning mathematics. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 58. 178–186. 22 indexed citations
3.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2018). Mathematics teacher educator-researchers’ perspectives on the use of theory in facilitating teacher growth. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 98(2). 197–214. 5 indexed citations
4.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2017). A novice mathematics teacher educator–researcher’s evolution of tools designed for in-service mathematics teachers’ professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 21(5). 517–539. 9 indexed citations
5.
Gravemeijer, Koeno, Michelle Stephan, Cyril Julie, Fou-Lai Lin, & Minoru Ohtani. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 15(S1). 105–123. 217 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2016). Inquiry-Based Mathematics Curriculum Design for Young Children-Teaching Experiment and Reflection. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 12(4). 8 indexed citations
7.
Ekawati, Rooselyna, Fou-Lai Lin, & Kai‐Lin Yang. (2015). Primary Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Ratio and Proportion in Mathematics: The Case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 11(3). 6 indexed citations
8.
Yang, Kai‐Lin, et al.. (2015). Exploring the educative power of an experienced mathematics teacher educator-researcher. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 89(1). 19–39. 8 indexed citations
9.
Ekawati, Rooselyna, Fou-Lai Lin, & Kai‐Lin Yang. (2014). DEVELOPING AN INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING TEACHERS’ MATHEMATICS CONTENT KNOWLEDGE ON RATIO AND PROPORTION: A CASE OF INDONESIAN PRIMARY TEACHERS. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 13(S1). 1–24. 21 indexed citations
10.
Ekawati, Rooselyna & Fou-Lai Lin. (2014). DESIGNING TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR MATHEMATICS TEACHING WITH VARIATION THEORY. Journal on Mathematics Education. 5(2). 4 indexed citations
12.
Huang, Chih‐Hsien & Fou-Lai Lin. (2012). USING ACTIVITY THEORY TO MODEL THE TAIWAN ATAYAL STUDENTS’ CLASSROOM MATHEMATICAL ACTIVITY. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 11(1). 213–236. 8 indexed citations
13.
Yang, Kai‐Lin & Fou-Lai Lin. (2012). Effects of reading-oriented tasks on students’ reading comprehension of geometry proof. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 24(2). 215–238. 9 indexed citations
14.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2008). LISTEN TO THE SILENCE: THE LEFT-BEHIND PHENOMENON AS SEEN THROUGH CLASSROOM VIDEOS AND TEACHERS’ REFLECTIONS. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(2). 405–429. 4 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2008). THE POWER OF LEARNING GOAL ORIENTATION IN PREDICTING STUDENT MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(3). 551–573. 8 indexed citations
17.
Stavy, Ruth, Reuven Babai, Pessia Tsamir, et al.. (2006). Are Intuitive Rules Universal?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 4(3). 417–436. 27 indexed citations
18.
Lin, Fou-Lai, et al.. (2004). The Features and Relationships of Reasoning, Proving and Understanding Proof in Number Patterns. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2(2). 227–256. 19 indexed citations
19.
Lin, Fou-Lai. (1988). Societal differences and their influences on children's mathematics understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 19(4). 471–497. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026