Ewa Bergqvist

718 total citations
22 papers, 414 citations indexed

About

Ewa Bergqvist is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ewa Bergqvist has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 414 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Education, 8 papers in Statistics and Probability and 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ewa Bergqvist's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (11 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). Ewa Bergqvist is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (11 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). Ewa Bergqvist collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Ewa Bergqvist's co-authors include Magnus Österholm, Tomas Bergqvist, Torulf Palm, Jesper Boesen, Björn Palmberg, Johan Lithner, Carina Granberg, Lovisa Sumpter, Ola Helenius and Uffe Thomas Jankvist and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Investigation, Journal of Curriculum Studies and ZDM.

In The Last Decade

Ewa Bergqvist

20 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ewa Bergqvist Sweden 9 364 171 92 48 41 22 414
Tomas Bergqvist Sweden 7 276 0.8× 122 0.7× 45 0.5× 56 1.2× 33 0.8× 21 304
Dietmar Küchemann United Kingdom 10 311 0.9× 164 1.0× 112 1.2× 25 0.5× 55 1.3× 27 403
Eva Thanheiser United States 13 464 1.3× 241 1.4× 89 1.0× 102 2.1× 22 0.5× 50 494
Michael D. Steele United States 13 451 1.2× 109 0.6× 150 1.6× 23 0.5× 22 0.5× 26 512
Milan Sherman United States 10 272 0.7× 106 0.6× 93 1.0× 31 0.6× 45 1.1× 23 344
Kristen N. Bieda United States 12 368 1.0× 153 0.9× 131 1.4× 39 0.8× 31 0.8× 39 435
Karen King United States 10 395 1.1× 153 0.9× 132 1.4× 31 0.6× 13 0.3× 16 453
Jonathan L. Brendefur United States 10 351 1.0× 112 0.7× 91 1.0× 41 0.9× 46 1.1× 34 400
Peter Huckstep United Kingdom 7 458 1.3× 208 1.2× 44 0.5× 39 0.8× 19 0.5× 15 492
Samuel Otten United States 15 405 1.1× 131 0.8× 127 1.4× 32 0.7× 12 0.3× 44 467

Countries citing papers authored by Ewa Bergqvist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ewa Bergqvist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewa Bergqvist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewa Bergqvist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ewa Bergqvist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewa Bergqvist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewa Bergqvist. The network helps show where Ewa Bergqvist may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ewa Bergqvist

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ewa Bergqvist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ewa Bergqvist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ewa Bergqvist. Ewa Bergqvist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2024). Students’ dynamic communication while transforming mathematical representations in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM. 56(4). 543–557. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2023). Applying a new framework of connections between mathematical symbols and natural language. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 72. 101097–101097.
3.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2022). Mathematical communication when using DGE::Balancing between object and representations. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2018). The role of linguistic features when reading and solving mathematics tasks in different languages. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 51. 41–55. 8 indexed citations
5.
Bergqvist, Ewa, Magnus Österholm, Carina Granberg, & Lovisa Sumpter. (2018). Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 81 indexed citations
6.
Bergqvist, Ewa & Tomas Bergqvist. (2016). The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 49(2). 149–168. 21 indexed citations
7.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2015). Uncommon vocabulary in mathematical tasks in relation to demand of reading ability and solution frequency. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. 20(1). 8 indexed citations
8.
Bergqvist, Ewa & Magnus Österholm. (2014). Språkbrukets roll i matematikundervisningen. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 2014(1). 27–31.
9.
Österholm, Magnus & Ewa Bergqvist. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM. 45(5). 751–763. 27 indexed citations
10.
Boesen, Jesper, Ola Helenius, Ewa Bergqvist, et al.. (2013). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 33. 72–87. 122 indexed citations
11.
Bergqvist, Ewa & Magnus Österholm. (2012). Communicating mathematics or mathematical communication? : An analysis of competence frameworks. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 101(27). 67–74. 4 indexed citations
12.
Bergqvist, Ewa, et al.. (2012). Relating vocabulary in mathematical tasks to aspects of reading and solving. Cancer Investigation. 25(3). 61–70. 7 indexed citations
13.
Österholm, Magnus & Ewa Bergqvist. (2012). Methodological issues when studying the relationship between reading and solving mathematical tasks. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. 17(1). 6 indexed citations
14.
Bergqvist, Ewa. (2012). University Mathematics Teachers' Views on the Required Reasoning in Calculus Exams. The Mathematics Enthusiast. 9(3). 371–408. 13 indexed citations
15.
Österholm, Magnus & Ewa Bergqvist. (2012). What mathematical task properties can cause an unnecessary demand of reading ability. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 661–670. 4 indexed citations
16.
Bergqvist, Ewa & Magnus Österholm. (2010). A theoretical model of the connection between the process of reading and the process of solving mathematical tasks. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 179(8). 47–57. 8 indexed citations
17.
Lithner, Johan, Ewa Bergqvist, Tomas Bergqvist, et al.. (2010). Mathematical competencies : A research framework. 157–167. 13 indexed citations
18.
Bergqvist, Ewa, Tomas Bergqvist, Jesper Boesen, et al.. (2010). Matematikutbildningens mål och undervisningens ändamålsenlighet : gymnasiet hösten 2009. DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University). 4 indexed citations
19.
Bergqvist, Ewa. (2009). A verbal factor in the PISA 2003 mathematics items : Tentative analyses. 145–152. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bergqvist, Ewa. (2007). Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 26(4). 348–370. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026