Emma Smith
Impact in
- Education top 5%
- Higher Education Research Studies
- Higher Education and Employability
- Education Systems and Policy
- School Choice and Performance
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Safety Research top 5%
- Career Development and Diversity
Papers in
-
- Career Development and Diversity 6
- Education 15
- Higher Education and Employability 7
- Education Systems and Policy 4
- Higher Education Research Studies 2
- Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques 1
Emma Smith
19 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Education 280
- Safety Research 72
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
- Modeling and Simulation 11
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 2
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Smith. The network helps show where Emma Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Emma Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 7 | The Oxford Tutorial: Thanks, You Taught Me How to Think | 2019 | 10 |
| 8 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 16 | Review of Widening Participation Research: Addressing the Barriers to Participation in Higher Education | 2006 | 185 |
| 17 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1971 | 1 |
About Emma Smith
Emma Smith is a scholar working on Safety Research, Education, Modeling and Simulation, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 19 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education and Employability (7 papers), Career Development and Diversity (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (1 paper) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (280 citations), Safety Research (72 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations), Modeling and Simulation (11 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations). Emma Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick White, Stephen Gorard, Kim Slack, Nick Adnett, Helen May, Liz Thomas, Roger Pearson, Alan Ryan, H. C. Price and Kris De Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Research Papers in Education, British Educational Research Journal, Oxford Review of Education, Education + Training and Educational Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.