Elaine Mo
About
In The Last Decade
Elaine Mo
9 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 194
- Education 126
- Literature and Literary Theory 83
- Language and Linguistics 67
- Linguistics and Language 48
Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Mo
This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Mo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Mo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Mo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Mo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Mo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Mo. The network helps show where Elaine Mo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine Mo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine Mo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine Mo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine Mo. Elaine Mo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 76 | |
| 9 | 40 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.