Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Input-Based and Time-Based Models of International Adjustment: Meta-Analytic Evidence and Theoretical Extensions
2005792 citationsDavid A. Harrison, Margaret A. Shaffer et al.Academy of Management Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dora Luk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dora Luk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dora Luk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dora Luk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dora Luk. The network helps show where Dora Luk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dora Luk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dora Luk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dora Luk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dora Luk. Dora Luk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Greenwood, Regina A., Neusa Maria Bastos Fernandes dos Santos, Edward F. Murphy, et al.. (2009). Workplace Generations: An Analysis of US And Latin American Generational Values. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).1 indexed citations
5.
Greenwood, Regina A., Silvia Inés Monserrat, Neusa Maria Bastos Fernandes dos Santos, et al.. (2009). Democracy's Children: Changing Values in Argentina and Brazil?. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).1 indexed citations
6.
Khilji, Shaista E., Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, Regina A. Greenwood, et al.. (2008). Intergenerational value change: A Cross cultural empirical test. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).1 indexed citations
7.
Greenwood, Regina A., Shaista E. Khilji, Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, et al.. (2008). A cross-cultural investigation of religious affiliation differences in personal values across 11 countries and six regions.2 indexed citations
8.
Mujtaba, Bahaudin G., et al.. (2007). The Cultural Value Rankings of Respondents in Thailand, Hong Kong and Afghanistan: Is There A Convergence or Divergence of Values?. International Journal of Business. 6(1). 48–68.11 indexed citations
9.
Greenwood, Regina A., Edward F. Murphy, Sankalp Chaturvedi, et al.. (2007). Generational value changes: Their history and a cross-cultural empirical test. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).5 indexed citations
10.
Greenwood, Regina A., Edward F. Murphy, Sankalp Chaturvedi, et al.. (2007). A cross-cultural investigation of personal values, attitudes towards women in developed and developing countries. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).3 indexed citations
11.
Greenwood, Regina A., Edward F. Murphy, Sankalp Chaturvedi, et al.. (2007). The values of males and females in the east and west: Are they diverging or converging. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University).2 indexed citations
12.
Harrison, David A., et al.. (2005). Input-Based and Time-Based Models of International Adjustment: Meta-Analytic Evidence and Theoretical Extensions. Academy of Management Journal. 48(2). 257–281.792 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.