Denis Alamargot

1.8k total citations
45 papers, 997 citations indexed

About

Denis Alamargot is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Denis Alamargot has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 997 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Education, 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 12 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Denis Alamargot's work include Writing and Handwriting Education (32 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (15 papers) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (11 papers). Denis Alamargot is often cited by papers focused on Writing and Handwriting Education (32 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (15 papers) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (11 papers). Denis Alamargot collaborates with scholars based in France, Canada and Portugal. Denis Alamargot's co-authors include Lucile Chanquoy, Marie‐France Morin, David Chesnet, Christine Ros, Eric G. Lambert, Gilles Caporossi, Michel Fayol, Denis Larocque, Virginia W. Berninger and Christel Bidet-Ildei and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Behavior Research Methods.

In The Last Decade

Denis Alamargot

41 papers receiving 912 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Denis Alamargot France 18 760 578 165 164 157 45 997
Lucile Chanquoy France 13 458 0.6× 354 0.6× 180 1.1× 123 0.8× 104 0.7× 49 717
Liliana Tolchinsky Spain 16 767 1.0× 874 1.5× 196 1.2× 118 0.7× 27 0.2× 78 1.3k
Josie Bernicot France 18 213 0.3× 445 0.8× 254 1.5× 153 0.9× 96 0.6× 60 802
Sylvia P. Abbott United States 9 1.5k 2.0× 1.3k 2.3× 429 2.6× 152 0.9× 46 0.3× 10 1.6k
María C. M. de Guerrero Puerto Rico 14 593 0.8× 495 0.9× 845 5.1× 72 0.4× 198 1.3× 20 1.4k
Bruce Saddler United States 15 891 1.2× 844 1.5× 207 1.3× 206 1.3× 42 0.3× 36 1.2k
Young‐Suk Grace Kim United States 25 1.2k 1.6× 1.9k 3.3× 253 1.5× 507 3.1× 21 0.1× 94 2.3k
N. Ann Chenoweth United States 11 535 0.7× 418 0.7× 517 3.1× 66 0.4× 21 0.1× 13 915
Mariëlle Leijten Belgium 15 549 0.7× 393 0.7× 284 1.7× 106 0.6× 29 0.2× 34 893
Maya Hickmann France 21 150 0.2× 703 1.2× 566 3.4× 188 1.1× 88 0.6× 59 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Alamargot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Alamargot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Alamargot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Alamargot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Alamargot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Alamargot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Alamargot. The network helps show where Denis Alamargot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Alamargot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Alamargot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Alamargot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Alamargot. Denis Alamargot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Molina, Michèle, et al.. (2020). Imagining handwriting movements in a usual or unusual position: effect of posture congruency on visual and kinesthetic motor imagery. Psychological Research. 85(6). 2237–2247. 6 indexed citations
2.
Morin, Marie‐France, et al.. (2019). Differences in Attitudes Toward Reading: A Survey of Pupils in Grades 5 to 8. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 2773–2773. 31 indexed citations
3.
Groen, Margriet A., et al.. (2019). Online management of text production from pictures: a comparison between fifth graders and undergraduate students. Psychological Research. 84(8). 2311–2324. 3 indexed citations
4.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2018). Handwriting in signing deaf middle-school students and relationship with text composition and spelling. Reading and Writing. 31(4). 1017–1038. 2 indexed citations
5.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2018). Handwriting on a tablet screen: Role of visual and proprioceptive feedback in the control of movement by children and adults. Human Movement Science. 65. 30–41. 44 indexed citations
6.
Alamargot, Denis. (2015). Postface : Litéracie scolaire : Intérêts et limites d’un concept. Le Français aujourd hui. 190(3). 115–120. 1 indexed citations
7.
Alamargot, Denis & Marie‐France Morin. (2015). Does handwriting on a tablet screen affect students’ graphomotor execution? A comparison between Grades Two and Nine. Human Movement Science. 44. 32–41. 72 indexed citations
8.
Alamargot, Denis. (2013). Du produit rédigé au processus rédactionnel : vers la nécessaire interdisciplinarité. Le Français aujourd hui. n°181(2). 145–151. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bidet-Ildei, Christel, et al.. (2013). Influence of handwriting skills during spelling in primary and lower secondary grades. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 818–818. 70 indexed citations
10.
Fayol, Michel, Denis Alamargot, & Virginia W. Berninger. (2012). Translation of thought to written text while composing : advancing theory, knowledge, research methods, tools, and applications. Psychology Press eBooks. 35 indexed citations
11.
Torrance, Mark, Denis Alamargot, Montserrat Castelló, et al.. (2012). Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research. 20 indexed citations
12.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2012). Interference with prior knowledge while writing from sources: Effects of working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 24(7). 815–828. 9 indexed citations
13.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2011). Le langage et ses niveaux d'analyse : cognition, production de formes, production du sens. Presses universitaires de Rennes eBooks. 1 indexed citations
14.
Alamargot, Denis, Gilles Caporossi, David Chesnet, & Christine Ros. (2011). What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition. Learning and Individual Differences. 21(5). 505–516. 31 indexed citations
15.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2010). Temporalité de l'écriture et rôle du texte produit dans l'activité rédactionnelle. Langages. n° 177(1). 7–28. 23 indexed citations
16.
Alamargot, Denis, et al.. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods. 38(2). 287–299. 129 indexed citations
17.
Chesnet, David & Denis Alamargot. (2005). Analyse en temps réel des activités oculaires et grapho-motrices du scripteur : intérêt du dispositif « Eye and Pen ». L’Année psychologique. 105(3). 477–520. 46 indexed citations
18.
Chanquoy, Lucile & Denis Alamargot. (2003). Mise en place et developpement des traitements redactionnels : le role de la memoire de travail. CogPrints (University of Southampton). 38(2). 171–190. 12 indexed citations
19.
Alamargot, Denis & Jerry Andriessen. (2002). The "power" of text production activity in collaborative learning situations.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
20.
Chanquoy, Lucile & Denis Alamargot. (2002). Working memory and writing: Model evolution and research assessment. CogPrints (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026