Countries citing papers authored by Christopher H. Tienken
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher H. Tienken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher H. Tienken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher H. Tienken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher H. Tienken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher H. Tienken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher H. Tienken. The network helps show where Christopher H. Tienken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher H. Tienken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher H. Tienken.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher H. Tienken based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher H. Tienken. Christopher H. Tienken is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tienken, Christopher H., et al.. (2016). A Comparison of Higher-Order Thinking Between the Common Core State Standards and the 2009 New Jersey Content Standards in High School. 12(4). 5–31.4 indexed citations
5.
Tienken, Christopher H.. (2015). Test Use and Abuse. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 51(4). 155–158.1 indexed citations
Tienken, Christopher H.. (2013). TIMSS Implications for U.S. Education. 9(4). 3–9.2 indexed citations
8.
Tienken, Christopher H. & Donald C. Orlich. (2013). Translating the Common Core State Standards.. 10(1). 3–7.3 indexed citations
9.
Tienken, Christopher H. & Donald C. Orlich. (2013). The School Reform Landscape. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks.12 indexed citations
10.
Tienken, Christopher H., et al.. (2012). An Evaluation of the Influence of Interim Assessments on Grade 8 Student Achievement in Mathematics and Language Arts.. The international journal of educational leadership preparation. 7(3).1 indexed citations
11.
Tienken, Christopher H.. (2011). Common Core State Standards: An Example of Data-Less Decision Making.. 7(4). 3–18.13 indexed citations
12.
Tienken, Christopher H., et al.. (2010). The Error of State Mandated High School Exams. Academic exchange quarterly. 14(2). 50.1 indexed citations
13.
Tienken, Christopher H. & Charles M. Achilles. (2009). Relationship between Class Size and Students' Opportunity to Learn Writing in Middle School.. Research in the schools. 16(1). 13–24.3 indexed citations
14.
Tienken, Christopher H. & David A. Canton. (2009). National Curriculum Standards: Let’s Think It Over. 6(3). 3–9.10 indexed citations
Tienken, Christopher H. & Michael Wilson. (2007). The Impact of Computer Assisted Instruction on Seventh-Grade Students' Mathematics Achievement.. Planning and changing. 38(3). 181–190.23 indexed citations
18.
Tienken, Christopher H., et al.. (2007). When Every Day Is Professional Development Day.. The Journal of staff development. 28(2). 24–29.9 indexed citations
19.
Tienken, Christopher H., et al.. (2006). Making Class Size Work in the Middle Grades.. 3(1). 26–36.1 indexed citations
20.
Tienken, Christopher H. & Charles M. Achilles. (2003). Changing Teacher Behavior and Improving Student Writing Achievement.. Planning and changing. 34. 153–168.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.