Charlotte E. Rees
- Family Practice top 0.1%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 19
- Research and Theory top 1%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 82
- Medical Education and Admissions 13
- General Health Professions top 0.2%
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 28
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 22
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 14
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 13
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Empathy and Medical Education 33
Charlotte E. Rees
163 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Family Practice 870
- Research and Theory 127
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.5k
- General Health Professions 3.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte E. Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte E. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte E. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte E. Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte E. Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte E. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte E. Rees. The network helps show where Charlotte E. Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charlotte E. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 18 | Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checkingbreakdown → | 2016 | 619 |
| 19 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 20 | Information-seeking behaviors of women with breast cancer. | 2001 | 107 |
About Charlotte E. Rees
Charlotte E. Rees is a scholar working on Family Practice, Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 168 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (82 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (33 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (28 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (22 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (19 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (14 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (13 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (870 citations), Research and Theory (127 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.5k citations), General Health Professions (3.0k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations). Charlotte E. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Lynn V. Monrouxe, Charlotte Sheard, Peter A. Bath, Rola Ajjawi, Lynn Knight, Bridget C. OʼBrien, Lara Varpio, Jennifer Cleland, Paul Crampton and Maggie Shepherd. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Advances in Health Sciences Education, BMJ Open, Medical Teacher and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.