Kate Seear

2.0k total citations
105 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Kate Seear is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Seear has authored 105 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 39 papers in Epidemiology and 22 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kate Seear's work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (33 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (11 papers). Kate Seear is often cited by papers focused on HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (33 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (11 papers). Kate Seear collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Kate Seear's co-authors include Suzanne Fraser, Kari Lancaster, Alan Petersen, Alison Ritter, Carla Treloar, David Moore, Megan Munsie, kylie valentine, Campbell Aitken and Renae Fomiatti and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Microbiology Reviews and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Kate Seear

97 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Seear Australia 20 440 329 312 286 228 105 1.3k
Helen Keane Australia 20 559 1.3× 453 1.4× 419 1.3× 286 1.0× 350 1.5× 69 1.6k
Albert D. Klassen United States 12 554 1.3× 320 1.0× 584 1.9× 78 0.3× 470 2.1× 15 1.5k
Emma Ward United Kingdom 18 70 0.2× 251 0.8× 166 0.5× 170 0.6× 368 1.6× 68 1.2k
Priscilla Pyett Australia 19 199 0.5× 459 1.4× 422 1.4× 139 0.5× 288 1.3× 37 1.2k
kylie valentine Australia 19 417 0.9× 409 1.2× 423 1.4× 209 0.7× 244 1.1× 84 1.3k
Carole H. Browner United States 28 93 0.2× 393 1.2× 575 1.8× 337 1.2× 235 1.0× 69 2.2k
Laura Mamo United States 20 78 0.2× 523 1.6× 433 1.4× 422 1.5× 479 2.1× 40 2.3k
Galen E. Cole United States 16 152 0.3× 188 0.6× 426 1.4× 290 1.0× 154 0.7× 42 1.0k
Jeanne C. Marsh United States 22 740 1.7× 233 0.7× 827 2.7× 463 1.6× 555 2.4× 69 2.2k
Beth Sundstrom United States 19 125 0.3× 191 0.6× 274 0.9× 335 1.2× 62 0.3× 72 921

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Seear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Seear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Seear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Seear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Seear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Seear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Seear. The network helps show where Kate Seear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Seear

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Seear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Seear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Seear. Kate Seear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2025). Is drug-use stigma a breach of human rights law?: Insights from Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy. 143. 104902–104902.
2.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2024). The Feminist Legislation Project. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).
3.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2024). Troubling complaint: Addressing hepatitis C‐related stigma and discrimination through complaint mechanisms. Sociology of Health & Illness. 46(7). 1400–1418. 5 indexed citations
4.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). Making and Breaking ‘Bad’ Habits in Drugs, Law and Human Rights Scrutiny. Performance Research. 28(6). 136–145. 2 indexed citations
5.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). The trouble with normalisation: Transformations to hepatitis C health care and stigma in an era of viral elimination. Sociology of Health & Illness. 45(7). 1421–1440. 6 indexed citations
6.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). A culture of rights finding its feet: parliamentary human rights scrutiny in the Australian Capital Territory. Journal of Legislative Studies. 31(1). 192–214. 1 indexed citations
7.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). Performing Hepatitis C, Problematising “Cure”: The Construction of Hepatitis C (Cure) in Social Security and Migration Law. Law & Literature. 37(1). 113–138. 1 indexed citations
8.
valentine, kylie, et al.. (2023). Hepatitis C data justice: the implications of data-driven approaches to the elimination of hepatitis C. Critical Public Health. 33(5). 803–813. 1 indexed citations
9.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). Forging new habits: critical drugs scholarship as an otherwise to rights. The International Journal of Human Rights. 28(8-9). 1329–1352. 6 indexed citations
10.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). A “Tick and Flick” Exercise: Movement and Form in Australian Parliamentary Human Rights Scrutiny. Dance Research Journal. 55(3). 47–64. 1 indexed citations
11.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2023). ‘I’m not hep C free’: afterlives of hepatitis C in the era of cure. Medical Humanities. 49(4). 678–687. 8 indexed citations
12.
Farrugia, Adrian, et al.. (2023). 'We've got a present for you’: Hepatitis C elimination, compromised healthcare subjects and treatment as a gift. Social Science & Medicine. 340. 116416–116416. 4 indexed citations
13.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2022). Echoes and Antibodies: Legal Veridiction and the Emergence of the Perpetual Hepatitis C Subject. Social & Legal Studies. 32(2). 216–236. 6 indexed citations
14.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2022). On tables, doors and listening spaces: parliamentary human rights scrutiny processes and engagement of others. Australian Journal of Human Rights. 28(2-3). 286–307. 1 indexed citations
15.
Seear, Kate, et al.. (2022). Making Rights and Realities: How Australian Human Rights Make Gender, Alcohol and Other Drugs. Australian Feminist Studies. 37(113). 347–364. 4 indexed citations
16.
Pennay, Amy, et al.. (2020). Decriminalising public drunkenness: Accountability and monitoring needed in the ongoing and evolving management of public intoxication. Drug and Alcohol Review. 40(2). 205–209. 1 indexed citations
17.
Rees, Charlotte E., Olivia King, Allie Clemans, et al.. (2019). Power and resistance in feedback during work-integrated learning: contesting traditional student-supervisor asymmetries. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(8). 1136–1154. 14 indexed citations
18.
King, Olivia, Allie Clemans, Jan Coles, et al.. (2019). Student dignity during work-integrated learning: a qualitative study exploring student and supervisors’ perspectives. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 25(1). 149–172. 13 indexed citations
19.
King, Olivia, Allie Clemans, Jan Coles, et al.. (2019). Dignity during work-integrated learning: what does it mean for supervisors and students?. Studies in Higher Education. 46(4). 721–736. 12 indexed citations
20.
Quilter, Julia, Luke McNamara, Kate Seear, & Robin Room. (2016). Criminal law and the effects of alcohol and other drugs: a national study of the significance of 'intoxication' in Australian legislation. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 39(3). 913–949. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026