Tina Brock

1.8k total citations
81 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Tina Brock is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Brock has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 27 papers in General Health Professions and 19 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Tina Brock's work include Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (19 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers). Tina Brock is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (19 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers). Tina Brock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Tina Brock's co-authors include Scott R. Smith, Claire Anderson, Kayley Lyons, Ian Bates, Dennis Williams, Arthur Christopoulos, Andreia Bruno, Margaret A. Chesney, Cheryl Marcus and John Rublein and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Tina Brock

77 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tina Brock

PHEOH

GHP

EDUCA

PHYSI

Sarah J. Shoemaker United States

Diane E. Beck United States

Lucinda L. Maine United States

Elizabeth Unni United States

Kenneth C. Hohmeier United States

Penelope Abbott Australia

Maija Hupli Finland

W. Dale Dauphinée Canada

Michelle Myall United Kingdom

Mark Crouch United States

Sarah J. Shoemaker United States

Tina Brock

198 ×0.4

PHEOH

765 ×2.1

GHP

348 ×1.0

48 ×0.2

EDUCA

61 ×0.5

PHYSI

Citations per year, relative to Tina Brock Tina Brock (= 1×) peers Sarah J. Shoemaker

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Brock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Brock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Brock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Brock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Brock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Brock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Brock. The network helps show where Tina Brock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Brock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Brock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Brock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Brock. Tina Brock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rhoney, Denise H., Kimberly K. Daugherty, Aleda M.H. Chen, et al.. (2025). From Strength to Struggle: Stakeholder Insights into the Readiness of Tomorrow’s Pharmacists. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 90(1). 101900–101900.

Rees, Charlotte E., Kayley Lyons, Tina Brock, et al.. (2024). Exploring preparedness transitions in medicine and pharmacy: a qualitative longitudinal study to inform multiprofessional learning opportunities. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 30(3). 711–734. 8 indexed citations

Choi, Tammie, Mahbub Sarkar, Maxine P. Bonham, et al.. (2023). Using contribution analysis to evaluate health professions and health sciences programs. Frontiers in Medicine. 10. 1146832–1146832. 1 indexed citations

Brock, Tina, et al.. (2023). Research and scholarly methods: The scholarship of teaching and learning. JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 6(9). 1071–1077. 2 indexed citations

Gruenberg, Katherine, et al.. (2021). Climate care is health care: A call for collaborative pharmacy action. JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 4(5). 631–638. 15 indexed citations

Gruenberg, Katherine, et al.. (2021). Active hope: The personal and professional roles of pharmacists in climate action. JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY. 4(12). 1508–1510. 4 indexed citations

Rees, Charlotte E., Tina Brock, Michelle Leech, et al.. (2021). Exploring health care graduates' conceptualisations of preparedness for practice: A longitudinal qualitative research study. Medical Education. 55(9). 1078–1090. 27 indexed citations

Gruenberg, Katherine, et al.. (2020). A Randomized, Crossover Pilot Study of a Novel Web-Based/Mobile Platform for Collaborative Small Group Practice in Therapeutic Reasoning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7. 2809596709–2809596709. 5 indexed citations

Brock, Tina, Thao Vu, Amudha Kadirvelu, Chooi Yeng Lee, & Fiona Kent. (2020). Implementing a collaborative medicine and pharmacy educational activity in two countries. Medical Education Online. 25(1). 1780697–1780697. 15 indexed citations

10.

Brock, Tina, et al.. (2020). COVID-19 and clinical pharmacy worldwide—A wake up call and a call to action. PMC. 2 indexed citations

11.

Steeb, David R., et al.. (2020). Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health. Academic Medicine. 96(3). 402–408. 14 indexed citations

12.

Palermo, Claire, Olivia King, Tina Brock, et al.. (2019). Setting priorities for health education research: A mixed methods study. Medical Teacher. 41(9). 1029–1038. 18 indexed citations

13.

Bruno, Andreia, Claire Anderson, Tina Brock, et al.. (2018). Structured Multi-Stakeholder Workshops to Advance a Global Transformative Roadmap for Pharmaceutical Workforce. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(3). 13–13. 2 indexed citations

14.

Shin, Jaekyu & Tina Brock. (2017). Content delivery models influence class preparation, study habits, and preferences. Pharmacy Education. 17(1). 341–349. 5 indexed citations

15.

Brock, Tina & Jan Boone. (2015). Interprofessional Education in a Pharmacy Context: Global Report 2015. UCL Discovery (University College London). 10 indexed citations

16.

Waheedi, Mohammad, et al.. (2015). Barriers to medication taking among Kuwaiti patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Patient Preference and Adherence. 9. 1491–1491. 47 indexed citations

17.

Brock, Tina, et al.. (2008). Can patients learn in a virtual world. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 281(7511). 1 indexed citations

18.

Brock, Tina & Scott R. Smith. (2007). An Interdisciplinary Online Course in Health Care Informatics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 71(3). 43–43. 1 indexed citations

19.

Brock, Tina & Scott R. Smith. (2007). An Interdisciplinary Online Course in Health Care Informatics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 71(3). 43–43. 22 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Scott R., John Rublein, Cheryl Marcus, Tina Brock, & Margaret A. Chesney. (2003). A medication self-management program to improve adherence to HIV therapy regimens. Patient Education and Counseling. 50(2). 187–199. 102 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact