Tina Brock
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Scott R. SmithClaire AndersonKayley LyonsIan BatesDennis WilliamsArthur ChristopoulosAndreia BrunoMargaret A. Chesney
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (19 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers)
- Cited by
- Geriatrics and GerontologyFamily PracticePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademic MedicineMedical Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tina Brock
77 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 462
- General Health Professions 366
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 336
- Education 200
- Physiology 127
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Brock
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Brock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Brock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Brock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Brock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Brock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Brock. The network helps show where Tina Brock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Brock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Brock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Brock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Brock. Tina Brock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | COVID-19 and clinical pharmacy worldwide—A wake up call and a call to action | 2 |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Content delivery models influence class preparation, study habits, and preferences | 5 |
| 15 | Interprofessional Education in a Pharmacy Context: Global Report 2015 | 10 |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | Can patients learn in a virtual world | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 102 |
About Tina Brock
Tina Brock is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Research and Theory, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (19 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (336 citations), Family Practice (115 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (462 citations). Tina Brock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott R. Smith, Claire Anderson, Kayley Lyons, Ian Bates, Dennis Williams, Arthur Christopoulos, Andreia Bruno, Margaret A. Chesney, Cheryl Marcus and John Rublein. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.