Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
2001797 citationsNorbert Schmitt, Diane Schmitt et al.Language Testingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Clapham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Clapham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Clapham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Clapham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Clapham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Clapham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Clapham. The network helps show where Caroline Clapham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Clapham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Clapham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Clapham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Clapham. Caroline Clapham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schmitt, Norbert, Diane Schmitt, & Caroline Clapham. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing. 18(1). 55–88.797 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Clapham, Caroline. (2000). ASSESSMENT AND TESTING. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 20. 147–161.27 indexed citations
Saville, Nick, Caroline Clapham, Alan Davies, et al.. (1996). Performance testing, cognition and assessment : selected papers from the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium (LTRC), Cambridge and Arnhem. Cambridge University Press eBooks.19 indexed citations
Clapham, Caroline. (1996). The development of IELTS : a study of the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension. Medical Entomology and Zoology.108 indexed citations
17.
Alderson, J. Charles, Caroline Clapham, & Dianne Wall. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.406 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.