Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

573 papers and 21.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 573 papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics usually cover Language and Linguistics (361 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (267 papers) and Linguistics and Language (240 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (250 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (222 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics are Elaine K. Horwitz, Barbara Seidlhofer, Patricia A. Duff, Christiane Dalton‐Puffer, Richard Schmidt, Anna Uhl Chamot, Susan M. Gass, Larry Vandergrift, Ron Darvin and Bonny Norton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Applied Linguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026