Bobby Naemi

19 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Bobby Naemi
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Gender Studies 44
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
  • Social Psychology 50
Replace Daniel Jurich with:
Daniel Jurich United States
Tine Buyse Belgium
Anouck Kluytmans Netherlands
Svetlana A. Beltyukova United States
Yunkyoung Loh Garrison United States
Erica E. Nason United States
Robert E. Gibby United States
Anne B. Scott United States
Michael J. Kern United States
Carolyn J. Winslow United States
Bobby Naemi relative to Daniel Jurich United States Daniel Jurich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Daniel Jurich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bobby Naemi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bobby Naemi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bobby Naemi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bobby Naemi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bobby Naemi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bobby Naemi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bobby Naemi. The network helps show where Bobby Naemi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bobby Naemi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bobby Naemi Line = papers co-authored together Bobby Naemi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200876
2 200940
3 201925
4 202315
5 201212
6 201911
7 201711
8 201210
9 201410
10 20167
11 20137
12 20236
13 20185
14 20165
15
Examining the "WorkFORCE"™ Assessment for Job Fit and Core Capabilities of "FACETS"™. Research Report. ETS RR-14-32.
20142
16 20232
17 20212
18
Examining the Relationship Between the AAMC Standardized Video Interview and Step 2 Cs Subscores
20191
19
Graduate Admissions Practices: A Targeted Review of the Literature. Research Report. ETS RR-19-33.
20191
20 20240

About Bobby Naemi

Bobby Naemi is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Education, having authored 20 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (29 citations), Gender Studies (44 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations) and Social Psychology (50 citations). Bobby Naemi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie C. Payne, Daniel J. Beal, Harrison J. Kell, Stephan J. Motowidlo, Richard D. Roberts, M. S. Roberts, Matthias von Davier, Patrick C. Kyllonen, Dana Dunleavy and Krista D. Mattern. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, JAMA Network Open, International Journal of Testing, Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives and Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact