Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature
20041.1k citationsR Bernard, Philip C. Abrami et al.Review of Educational Researchprofile →
Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis
2008619 citationsPhilip C. Abrami, R Bernard et al.Review of Educational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Wade more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Wade. The network helps show where Anne Wade may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Wade
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Wade.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Wade based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Wade. Anne Wade is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cheung, Alan, Barley Mak, Philip C. Abrami, Anne Wade, & Larysa Lysenko. (2016). The effectiveness of the ABRACADABRA (ABRA) web-based literacy program onprimary school students in Hong Kong. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 27(3). 219–245.5 indexed citations
Wade, Anne, et al.. (2012). An Online Information Literacy Course for Undergraduates: Early Experiences 1.1 indexed citations
11.
Meyer, Elizabeth J., et al.. (2010). Using Electronic Portfolios to Foster Communication in K-12 Classrooms. DigitalCommons@CalPoly. 125–134.1 indexed citations
Abrami, Philip C., R Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, et al.. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 78(4). 1102–1134.619 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Abrami, Philip C., et al.. (2007). Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning Through Electronic Portfolios. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2007(1). 2263–2268.1 indexed citations
15.
Wade, Anne, et al.. (2006). ePEARL: Electronic Portfolio Encouraging Active Reflection Learning. Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Bernard, R, Philip C. Abrami, Anne Wade, Eugene Borokhovski, & Yiping Lou. (2005). The Effects of Synchronous and Asynchronous Distance Education: A Meta-Analytical Assessment of Simonson's "Equivalency Theory". 2004(1).4 indexed citations
Wade, Anne, et al.. (2005). Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, V31(3) Fall / automne, 2005.1 indexed citations
20.
Bernard, R, Philip C. Abrami, Yiping Lou, et al.. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research. 74(3). 379–439.1074 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.