Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez

2.6k citations
38 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 957
  • Language and Linguistics 705
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 216
  • Artificial Intelligence 412
  • Literature and Literary Theory 134
Replace Aline Godfroid with:
Aline Godfroid United States
Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia New Zealand
June Eyckmans Belgium
Marije Michel Netherlands
Nuria Sagarra United States
Debra M. Hardison United States
Gülcan Erçetin Türkiye
Ute Römer United States
Andrea Révész United Kingdom
Irina Elgort New Zealand
Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez relative to Aline Godfroid United States Aline Godfroid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Aline Godfroid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez. The network helps show where Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez Line = papers co-authored together Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20240
5 20240
6 20241
7 20242
8 20241
9 20241
10 20237
11 20219
12 20218
13 202039
14 202018
15 201921
16
Understanding formulaic language : a second language acquisition perspective
201889
17 2018112
18
Eye-tracking a guide for applied linguistics research
201850
19 201828
20 2015121

About Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez

Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Acquisition and Learning (32 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (13 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (12 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (10 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (957 citations), Language and Linguistics (705 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (216 citations). Ana Pellicer‐Sánchez has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include Kathy Conklin, Norbert Schmitt, Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia, Gareth Carrol, Laura Vilkaitė‐Lozdienė, Elsa Tragant, Raquel Serrano, Michael Rodgers, Àngels Llanes and Zoltán Dörnyei. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, TESOL Quarterly and Language Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026