Language Learning

1.8k papers and 107.7k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Language Learning in the last decades have received a total of 107.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Language Learning usually cover Language and Linguistics (1.0k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.0k papers) and Linguistics and Language (443 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (782 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (506 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (407 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language Learning are R. C. Gardner, Zoltán Dörnyei, Peter D. MacIntyre, Luke Plonsky, Rod Ellis, Robert B. Kaplan, John Truscott, Teresa Pica, Lourdes Ortega and Tracey M. Derwing.

In The Last Decade

Language Learning

1.7k papers receiving 87.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Language Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Language Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026