Allison Duke
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Darren C. TreadwayJacob W. BrelandGarry L. AdamsGerald R. FerrisJason Bennett ThatcherJoseph M. GoodmanM. HarveyJoyce Thompson Heames
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers)Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Allison Duke
13 papers receiving 675 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 443
- Sociology and Political Science 348
- Social Psychology 209
- Gender Studies 90
- General Health Professions 72
Countries citing papers authored by Allison Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Duke. The network helps show where Allison Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Allison Duke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Allison Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Allison Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Allison Duke. Allison Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 140 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | 217 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | Factors affecting university women's basketball coaches' timeout decisions. | 14 |
About Allison Duke
Allison Duke is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Business and International Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers) and Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (443 citations), Social Psychology (209 citations) and Gender Studies (90 citations). Allison Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Darren C. Treadway, Jacob W. Breland, Garry L. Adams, Gerald R. Ferris, Jason Bennett Thatcher, Joseph M. Goodman, M. Harvey, Joyce Thompson Heames, Robyn L. Brouer and Milorad M. Novičević. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Ethics and The Leadership Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.