Stephen J. Stapleton

28 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 42
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 66
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Emergency Medicine 70
  • Emergency Medical Services 39
Replace Patricia K. Tuite with:
Patricia K. Tuite United States
Fiona Paul United Kingdom
Maria‐Eulàlia Juvé‐Udina Spain
Abigail Wickson‐Griffiths Canada
Mahmoud Al‐Kalaldeh Jordan
Mona Persenius Sweden
Wendy Lewandowski United States
Janice S. Hayes United States
Ayla Yava Türkiye
Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam Iran
Stephen J. Stapleton relative to Patricia K. Tuite United States Patricia K. Tuite's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Patricia K. Tuite · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Stapleton. The network helps show where Stephen J. Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201362
2 201149
3 201937
4 201229
5 201928
6 200925
7 201622
8 201520
9 201716
10 201815
11 200814
12 201614
13 201911
14 20178
15 20188
16 20197
17 20206
18 20145
19 20184
20 20224

About Stephen J. Stapleton

Stephen J. Stapleton is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (42 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (66 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Emergency Medicine (70 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (39 citations). Stephen J. Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kim Schafer Astroth, Sheryl Jenkins, Diana J. Wilkie, Wendy M. Woith, Janean E. Holden, Joel B. Epstein, Susan Barnason, Gordon Lee Gillespie, Andrea Slivinski and Allison Duke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Emergency Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Nursing Education, BDJ and Cancer Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026