Mark N. Bing

3.0k total citations
48 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Mark N. Bing is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark N. Bing has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Social Psychology, 17 papers in Clinical Psychology and 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark N. Bing's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (16 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers). Mark N. Bing is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (16 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers). Mark N. Bing collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iran and Romania. Mark N. Bing's co-authors include H. Kristl Davison, Nima Ghorbani, Milorad M. Novičević, P. J. Watson, Susan M. Stewart, James M. LeBreton, Donald H. Kluemper, Michael D. McIntyre, Lawrence R. James and Anthony P. Ammeter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Mark N. Bing

47 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark N. Bing United States 27 730 715 708 599 213 48 2.1k
H. Kristl Davison United States 24 658 0.9× 623 0.9× 634 0.9× 544 0.9× 180 0.8× 45 2.0k
Carlo Tramontano United Kingdom 24 967 1.3× 1.2k 1.6× 553 0.8× 719 1.2× 265 1.2× 50 2.6k
Nichelle C. Carpenter United States 16 623 0.9× 710 1.0× 998 1.4× 296 0.5× 148 0.7× 22 1.8k
Ryan Fehr United States 20 838 1.1× 1.2k 1.7× 943 1.3× 548 0.9× 326 1.5× 44 2.4k
Jason J. Dahling United States 28 1.1k 1.5× 997 1.4× 1.4k 1.9× 515 0.9× 236 1.1× 52 2.9k
Phillip W. Braddy United States 19 810 1.1× 786 1.1× 880 1.2× 670 1.1× 119 0.6× 29 2.7k
Adam Barsky Australia 13 751 1.0× 766 1.1× 906 1.3× 378 0.6× 228 1.1× 20 2.1k
James E. Burroughs United States 16 974 1.3× 927 1.3× 393 0.6× 341 0.6× 120 0.6× 29 3.0k
Bonnie Hayden Cheng Hong Kong 10 1.1k 1.4× 1.1k 1.5× 758 1.1× 346 0.6× 73 0.3× 26 2.4k
Huiwen Lian United States 19 1.2k 1.6× 1.6k 2.2× 1.8k 2.5× 645 1.1× 248 1.2× 35 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark N. Bing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark N. Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark N. Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark N. Bing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark N. Bing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark N. Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark N. Bing. The network helps show where Mark N. Bing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark N. Bing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark N. Bing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark N. Bing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark N. Bing. Mark N. Bing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davison, H. Kristl, et al.. (2022). Ambition: a deterrent to workplace deviance among narcissistic leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 43(3). 422–434. 3 indexed citations
2.
Davison, H. Kristl, et al.. (2021). The effects of faking on the relationship between cognitive ability and conscientiousness: A cautionary note. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 29(2). 203–218. 7 indexed citations
3.
Kluemper, Donald H., Shannon G. Taylor, Wm. Matthew Bowler, Mark N. Bing, & Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben. (2019). How leaders perceive employee deviance: Blaming victims while excusing favorites.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 104(7). 946–964. 35 indexed citations
4.
Bing, Mark N., et al.. (2015). Reward me, charity, or both? The impact of fees and benefits in loyalty programs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 25. 71–80. 28 indexed citations
5.
Kluemper, Donald H., Benjamin D. McLarty, & Mark N. Bing. (2014). Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(1). 237–248. 75 indexed citations
6.
Bing, Mark N., et al.. (2012). An Experimental Investigation of an Interactive Model of Academic Cheating Among Business School Students. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 11(1). 28–48. 57 indexed citations
7.
Davison, H. Kristl, et al.. (2011). Friend or Foe? The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Social Networking Sites for HR Decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology. 26(2). 153–159. 145 indexed citations
8.
Davison, H. Kristl, et al.. (2011). To Screen or Not to Screen? Using the Internet for Selection Decisions. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 24(1). 1–21. 72 indexed citations
9.
Bing, Mark N., et al.. (2011). Overclaiming as a measure of faking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 116(1). 148–162. 71 indexed citations
10.
Stewart, Susan M., Mark N. Bing, H. Kristl Davison, David J. Woehr, & Michael D. McIntyre. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94(1). 207–215. 149 indexed citations
11.
Davison, H. Kristl & Mark N. Bing. (2008). The multidimensionality of the equity sensitivity construct: Integrating separate benevolence and entitlement dimensions for enhanced construct measurement.. Journal of managerial issues. 20(1). 131. 16 indexed citations
12.
Davison, H. Kristl, et al.. (2008). Confounding Issues in the Deadweight Loss of Gift-Giving. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3 indexed citations
13.
Gruys, Melissa L., Susan M. Stewart, Jerry Goodstein, Mark N. Bing, & Andrew C. Wicks. (2008). Values Enactment in Organizations: A Multi-Level Examination. Journal of Management. 34(4). 806–843. 32 indexed citations
14.
Bing, Mark N., Susan M. Stewart, & H. Kristl Davison. (2008). An Investigation of Calculator Use on Employment Tests of Mathematical Ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 69(2). 322–350.
15.
Bing, Mark N., et al.. (2007). An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: Implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92(3). 722–744. 75 indexed citations
16.
Bing, Mark N., et al.. (2004). Incremental Validity of the Frame-of-Reference Effect in Personality Scale Scores: A Replication and Extension.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(1). 150–157. 136 indexed citations
17.
Ghorbani, Nima, P. J. Watson, Stephen W. Krauss, H. Kristl Davison, & Mark N. Bing. (2004). Private Self-Consciousness Factors: Relationships With Need for Cognition, Locus of Control, and Obsessive Thinking in Iran and the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology. 144(4). 359–372. 29 indexed citations
18.
Ghorbani, Nima, et al.. (2002). Self‐reported emotional intelligence: Construct similarity and functional dissimilarity of higher‐order processing in Iran and the United States. International Journal of Psychology. 37(5). 297–308. 98 indexed citations
19.
Bing, Mark N. & Susan M. Burroughs. (2001). The predictive and interactive effects of equity sensitivity in teamwork‐oriented organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 22(3). 271–290. 56 indexed citations
20.
Bing, Mark N.. (1999). Hypercompetitiveness in Academia: Achieving Criterion-Related Validity From Item Context Specificity. Journal of Personality Assessment. 73(1). 80–99. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Kristl Davison Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carlo Tramontano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nichelle C. Carpenter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ryan Fehr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason J. Dahling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phillip W. Braddy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adam Barsky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James E. Burroughs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bonnie Hayden Cheng Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Huiwen Lian
Rankless by CCL
2026