Mark N. Bing

47 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark N. Bing
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 708
  • Applied Psychology 182
  • Social Psychology 715
  • Information Systems and Management 213
  • Clinical Psychology 599
Replace H. Kristl Davison with:
H. Kristl Davison United States
Carlo Tramontano United Kingdom
Nichelle C. Carpenter United States
Ryan Fehr United States
Phillip W. Braddy United States
Jason J. Dahling United States
Huiwen Lian United States
Adam Barsky Australia
Emily Heaphy United States
Bonnie Hayden Cheng Hong Kong
Mark N. Bing relative to H. Kristl Davison United States H. Kristl Davison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Kristl Davison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark N. Bing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark N. Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark N. Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark N. Bing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark N. Bing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark N. Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark N. Bing. The network helps show where Mark N. Bing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark N. Bing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark N. Bing Line = papers co-authored together Mark N. Bing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009149
2 2001148
3 2008146
4 2011145
5 2004136
6 2011108
7 200298
8 200785
9 200277
10 200775
11 201475
12 201172
13 201171
14
The truth(s) on testing for mediation in the social and organizational sciences
200860
15 201858
16 201257
17 200057
18 200156
19 200254
20 200438

About Mark N. Bing

Mark N. Bing is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (16 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (5 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (708 citations), Applied Psychology (182 citations), Social Psychology (715 citations), Information Systems and Management (213 citations) and Clinical Psychology (599 citations). Mark N. Bing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. Kristl Davison, Nima Ghorbani, Milorad M. Novičević, P. J. Watson, Susan M. Stewart, James M. LeBreton, Donald H. Kluemper, Michael D. McIntyre, Lawrence R. James and Scott J. Vitell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Business and Psychology and International Journal of Selection and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact