Countries citing papers authored by Albert Ziegler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Ziegler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Ziegler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Ziegler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Ziegler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Ziegler. The network helps show where Albert Ziegler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert Ziegler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert Ziegler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert Ziegler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Albert Ziegler. Albert Ziegler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vialle, Wilma, et al.. (2015). Why experts can do what they do: the effects of exogenous resources on the Domain Impact Level of Activities (DILA). Research Online (University of Wollongong). 57(1). 94.8 indexed citations
4.
Vialle, Wilma, et al.. (2015). Diagnosing resources for effective learning via teacher and parent checklists. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 57(2). 201.14 indexed citations
5.
Vialle, Wilma, et al.. (2015). Learning resources within the Actiotope: A validation study of the QELC (Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital). Research Online (University of Wollongong). 57(1). 40.17 indexed citations
6.
Stoeger, Heidrun, Sebastian Suggate, & Albert Ziegler. (2013). Identifying the causes of underachievement: A plea for the inclusion of fine motor skills. 55(3). 274.6 indexed citations
7.
Vialle, Wilma, et al.. (2013). A cross-cultural validation study of the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) in China, Germany and Turkey. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 55(4). 462.35 indexed citations
Ziegler, Albert & Heidrun Stoeger. (2010). How Fine Motor Skills Influence the Assessment of High Abilities and Underachievement in Math.. journal for the education of the gifted. 34(2). 195–219.17 indexed citations
10.
Ziegler, Albert, et al.. (2010). Standards for field evaluations of modifications to educational settings. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 20. 156–169.1 indexed citations
Ziegler, Albert & Heidrun Stoeger. (2008). A learning oriented subjective action space as an indicator of giftedness. 50(2). 222.8 indexed citations
13.
Stoeger, Heidrun & Albert Ziegler. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International education journal. 6(2). 261–271.46 indexed citations
Heller, Kurt Α., Monika Finsterwald, & Albert Ziegler. (2001). Implicit Theories of German Mathematics and Physics Teachers on Gender Specific Giftedness and Motivation. 43(1). 172.12 indexed citations
16.
Ziegler, Albert. (2001). Achievement Motivation and Implicit Theories of Intelligence. 43(1). 1.1 indexed citations
Gruber, Hans & Albert Ziegler. (1990). Expertisegrad und Wissensbasis: Eine Untersuchung bei Schachspielern. University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.