Ajda Kahveci

497 total citations
26 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

Ajda Kahveci is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ajda Kahveci has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ajda Kahveci's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Educational Leadership and Administration (5 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (4 papers). Ajda Kahveci is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Educational Leadership and Administration (5 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (4 papers). Ajda Kahveci collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Australia. Ajda Kahveci's co-authors include Penny J. Gilmer, Sherry A. Southerland, Tugba G. Kucukkal, Scott E. Lewis, Gwendolyn Lawrie, Fatma Neşe Şahin, Nicole Graulich, James Nyachwaya, Nasser Mansour and Michael K. Seery and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Science Education and International Journal of Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Ajda Kahveci

21 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ajda Kahveci United States 11 249 97 47 37 35 26 334
Heather B. Gonzalez 4 221 0.9× 56 0.6× 56 1.2× 22 0.6× 32 0.9× 8 331
Phillip A. Boda United States 9 141 0.6× 47 0.5× 38 0.8× 15 0.4× 21 0.6× 23 239
Julie Smart United States 9 403 1.6× 150 1.5× 19 0.4× 42 1.1× 46 1.3× 20 477
Curtis Pyke United States 8 262 1.1× 132 1.4× 28 0.6× 17 0.5× 23 0.7× 10 330
Ann Harlow New Zealand 12 314 1.3× 80 0.8× 17 0.4× 12 0.3× 32 0.9× 37 419
Israel Touitou United States 10 208 0.8× 69 0.7× 18 0.4× 37 1.0× 37 1.1× 15 308
Nancy R. Romance United States 11 282 1.1× 205 2.1× 15 0.3× 16 0.4× 25 0.7× 33 384
James Lockard United States 8 186 0.7× 90 0.9× 14 0.3× 13 0.4× 23 0.7× 24 267
Havva Yamak Türkiye 9 323 1.3× 90 0.9× 12 0.3× 10 0.3× 77 2.2× 25 382
Helen Georgiou Australia 9 188 0.8× 57 0.6× 11 0.2× 14 0.4× 34 1.0× 31 287

Countries citing papers authored by Ajda Kahveci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ajda Kahveci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ajda Kahveci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ajda Kahveci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ajda Kahveci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ajda Kahveci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ajda Kahveci. The network helps show where Ajda Kahveci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ajda Kahveci

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ajda Kahveci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ajda Kahveci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ajda Kahveci. Ajda Kahveci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Graulich, Nicole, Scott E. Lewis, Ajda Kahveci, James Nyachwaya, & Gwendolyn Lawrie. (2021). Writing a review article: what to do with my literature review. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 22(3). 561–564. 14 indexed citations
2.
Lawrie, Gwendolyn, Nicole Graulich, Ajda Kahveci, & Scott E. Lewis. (2021). Ethical statements: a refresher of the minimum requirements for publication of chemistry education research and practice articles. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 22(2). 234–236. 3 indexed citations
3.
Lawrie, Gwendolyn, Nicole Graulich, Ajda Kahveci, & Scott E. Lewis. (2020). Steps towards publishing your thesis or dissertation research: avoiding the pitfalls in turning a treasured tome into a highly-focussed article for CERP. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 21(3). 694–697. 1 indexed citations
4.
Seery, Michael K., Ajda Kahveci, Gwendolyn Lawrie, & Scott E. Lewis. (2019). Evaluating articles submitted for publication inChemistry Education Research and Practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 20(2). 335–339. 10 indexed citations
5.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2017). Exploring Science Teachers’ Affective States: Pedagogical Discontentment, Self-efficacy, Intentions to Reform, and Their Relationships. Research in Science Education. 48(6). 1359–1386. 9 indexed citations
7.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2016). Construct Validity and Reliability Measures of Scores from the Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Discontentment (STPD) Scale. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 12(3). 4 indexed citations
9.
Kahveci, Ajda. (2015). Assessing high school students' attitudes toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 16(2). 283–292. 42 indexed citations
10.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2011). COMPUTER PERCEPTIONS OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS AND IMPACTING DEMOGRAPHICS: A TURKISH PERSPECTIVE. ˜The œturkish online journal of educational technology. 10(1). 71–80. 19 indexed citations
11.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2011). MADDENİN TANECİKLİ YAPISI İLE İLGİLİ İKİ AŞAMALI TANILAYICI SORULARIN ONTOLOJİ TEMELİNDE GELİŞTİRİLMESİ. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 41(191). 135–156.
12.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2010). Fakülte-okul i˙şbirligi modelinin değerlendirilmesi: Ortaöğretim fen alanlari öğretmen adaylarinin görüşleri. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(4). 148–168.
13.
Kahveci, Ajda, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of Faculty-School Partnership Model: Pre-service Science Teachers’ Views. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(4). 148–168.
14.
Kahveci, Ajda. (2010). Looking from a CHAT-IT perspective to undergraduate Mexican physics: organizational trajectories or professors as agents of change?. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 5(3). 735–741. 1 indexed citations
15.
Çakır, Mustafa, et al.. (2010). FAKÜLTE-OKUL İŞBİRLİĞİ MODELİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: UYGULAMA ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN GÖRÜŞLERİ. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 31(31). 69–81. 4 indexed citations
16.
Kahveci, Ajda, Sherry A. Southerland, & Penny J. Gilmer. (2007). From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women's program. Science Education. 92(1). 33–64. 35 indexed citations
17.
Kahveci, Ajda, Penny J. Gilmer, & Sherry A. Southerland. (2007). Understanding Chemistry Professors’ Use of Educational Technologies: An activity theoretical approach. International Journal of Science Education. 30(3). 325–351. 16 indexed citations
18.
Kahveci, Ajda, Sherry A. Southerland, & Penny J. Gilmer. (2006). Retaining Undergraduate Women in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering.. The journal of college science teaching. 36(3). 34–38. 44 indexed citations
19.
Kahveci, Ajda. (2005). Impact of a Women's Program for Science, Mathematics and Engineering on Undergraduate Women: Activity Systems on the Periphery. 1 indexed citations
20.
Kahveci, Ajda. (2003). Chemistry At A Distance: Instructional Strategies And The Internet Component Of The Courses- A Chronological Review of the Literature. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026