Countries where authors publish in Studying Teacher Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studying Teacher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studying Teacher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studying Teacher Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Studying Teacher Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Studying Teacher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studying Teacher Education.
About Studying Teacher Education
The 420 papers published in Studying Teacher Education in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Studying Teacher Education usually cover Education (378 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (25 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (49 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (292 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (129 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (98 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (86 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (34 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (31 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (28 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studying Teacher Education are John Loughran, Jason K. Ritter, Tom Russell, Shawn Michael Bullock, Amanda Berry, Julian Kitchen, Sandy Schuck, Mary Lynn Hamilton, Todd Dinkelman and Jason Margolis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.