Studying Teacher Education

412 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 412 papers published in Studying Teacher Education in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Studying Teacher Education usually cover Education (372 papers), Sociology and Political Science (124 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (48 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (288 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (128 papers) and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studying Teacher Education are Jason K. Ritter, John Loughran, Tom Russell, Amanda Berry, Shawn Michael Bullock, Julian Kitchen, Sandy Schuck, Mary Lynn Hamilton, Jason Margolis and Todd Dinkelman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studying Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studying Teacher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studying Teacher Education.

Countries where authors publish in Studying Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studying Teacher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studying Teacher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studying Teacher Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025