Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge
2012319 citationsJeffrey John Loughran, Pamela Mulhall et al.profile →
Teacher Professional Development Focusing on Pedagogical Content Knowledge
2012278 citationsJan van Driel, Amanda Berryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Berry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Berry. The network helps show where Amanda Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Berry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Berry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Berry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Berry. Amanda Berry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McDonough, Sharon, Rachel Forgasz, Amanda Berry, & Monica Taylor. (2016). All brain and still no body: Moving towards a pedagogy of embodiment in teacher education. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia).7 indexed citations
12.
Berry, Amanda. (2016). Teacher educators' professional learning: A necessary case of 'on your own'?. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).7 indexed citations
13.
Berry, Amanda, et al.. (2016). Learning together as teachers and researchers: Growing shared expertise in a self-study community of inquiry.. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).2 indexed citations
14.
Forgasz, Rachel, Sharon McDonough, & Amanda Berry. (2014). Embodied approaches to S-STEP research into teacher educator emotion. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia).1 indexed citations
15.
Loughran, Jeffrey John, Amanda Berry, Rebecca Cooper, Stephen Keast, & Garry Hoban. (2012). Preservice teachers learning about teaching for conceptual change through slowmation. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).5 indexed citations
Keast, Stephen, Rebecca Cooper, Amanda Berry, John Loughran, & Garry Hoban. (2009). Using Slowmation to stimulate thinking about pedagogical intent in science teaching and learning. Figshare.3 indexed citations
18.
Brown, Cameron L., Amanda Berry, J. B. Curtis, et al.. (2004). Feasibility Study on the Establishment of a Large Scale Inshore Resource Mapping Project. Marine Institute Open Access Repository (Marine Institute).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.