Critical Studies in Education

529 papers and 9.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 529 papers published in Critical Studies in Education in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Studies in Education usually cover Education (356 papers), Sociology and Political Science (267 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (236 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (197 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (118 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Studies in Education are Raewyn Connell, Bob Lingard, Ben Williamson, Michalinos Zembylas, Kathleen Lynch, Sam Sellar, Kalervo Ν. Gulson, Trevor Gale, Amanda Keddie and Pat Thomson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Studies in Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Studies in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Studies in Education.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Studies in Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Studies in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Studies in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Studies in Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025