Studies in the Education of Adults

565 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 565 papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults usually cover Education (362 papers), Sociology and Political Science (152 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (140 papers) specifically the topics of Adult and Continuing Education Topics (143 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (118 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in the Education of Adults are Gert Biesta, Michael Tedder, Stephen Billett, Robin Usher, Richard Edwards, Kathryn Ecclestone, Tara Fenwick, Peter Alheit, Lyn Tett and Chad Hoggan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in the Education of Adults

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in the Education of Adults. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in the Education of Adults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in the Education of Adults more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025