Tyler G. Okimoto
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Madeline E. HeilmanMichael WenzelVictoria L. BrescollN. T. FeatherMichael J. PlatowDena M. GrometMatthew J. HornseyDetlef Fetchenhauer
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (30 papers)Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (27 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (15 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Applied Psychology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Tyler G. Okimoto
70 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Sociology and Political Science 1.8k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Gender Studies 1.1k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 512
- Clinical Psychology 497
Countries citing papers authored by Tyler G. Okimoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler G. Okimoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler G. Okimoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler G. Okimoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tyler G. Okimoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler G. Okimoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler G. Okimoto. The network helps show where Tyler G. Okimoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tyler G. Okimoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tyler G. Okimoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tyler G. Okimoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tyler G. Okimoto. Tyler G. Okimoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 'I Make No Apology': The Psychological Benefits of Refusing to Apologize | 0 |
| 20 | 21 |
About Tyler G. Okimoto
Tyler G. Okimoto is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (30 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (27 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (512 citations). Tyler G. Okimoto has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Madeline E. Heilman, Michael Wenzel, Victoria L. Brescoll, N. T. Feather, Michael J. Platow, Dena M. Gromet, Matthew J. Hornsey, Detlef Fetchenhauer, Sebastian Lotz and Thomas Schlösser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.