Thomas Schlösser

1.9k total citations
32 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Thomas Schlösser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Schlösser has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Safety Research and 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Schlösser's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers). Thomas Schlösser is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers). Thomas Schlösser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Thomas Schlösser's co-authors include Detlef Fetchenhauer, Olga Stavrova, David Dunning, Detlef Fetchenhauer, Sebastian Lotz, Anna Baumert, Justin Kruger, Kerri L. Johnson, Manfred Schmitt and Daniel Ehlebracht and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Schlösser

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Schlösser Germany 18 614 423 288 286 185 32 1.2k
Detlef Fetchenhauer Germany 19 741 1.2× 389 0.9× 464 1.6× 459 1.6× 52 0.3× 47 1.4k
Stephen M. Garcia United States 17 759 1.2× 400 0.9× 325 1.1× 208 0.7× 34 0.2× 49 1.5k
Eileen Y. Chou United States 16 466 0.8× 319 0.8× 297 1.0× 109 0.4× 40 0.2× 33 1.0k
Jennifer Jordan Netherlands 18 520 0.8× 415 1.0× 171 0.6× 405 1.4× 30 0.2× 37 1.4k
Russell W. Clement United States 10 737 1.2× 504 1.2× 137 0.5× 240 0.8× 39 0.2× 20 1.2k
Bonnie Hayden Cheng Hong Kong 10 1.1k 1.7× 1.1k 2.6× 211 0.7× 247 0.9× 102 0.6× 26 2.4k
Jonathan Z. Berman United States 12 497 0.8× 259 0.6× 216 0.8× 288 1.0× 34 0.2× 24 941
Sanford E. DeVoe Canada 18 350 0.6× 401 0.9× 114 0.4× 109 0.4× 35 0.2× 34 1.1k
Vanessa K. Bohns United States 18 424 0.7× 391 0.9× 145 0.5× 220 0.8× 25 0.1× 41 903
Gerold Mikula Austria 19 867 1.4× 560 1.3× 120 0.4× 193 0.7× 44 0.2× 34 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schlösser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schlösser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schlösser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schlösser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schlösser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schlösser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schlösser. The network helps show where Thomas Schlösser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Schlösser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Schlösser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Schlösser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Schlösser. Thomas Schlösser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schlösser, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Do We Know Whom to Trust? A Review on Trustworthiness Detection Accuracy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 35(1). 3 indexed citations
2.
Ziller, Conrad, et al.. (2022). Local ties that bind: The role of perceived neighborhood cohesion and disorder for immigrants’ national identification. Social Science Research. 112. 102803–102803. 2 indexed citations
3.
Schlösser, Thomas, et al.. (2021). The Interplay of Social Status and Trust: A Critical Review of Concepts, Operationalizations, and Findings. Review of General Psychology. 25(2). 203–220. 10 indexed citations
4.
Fetchenhauer, Detlef, et al.. (2020). Does betrayal aversion really guide trust decisions towards strangers?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 33(4). 556–566. 6 indexed citations
5.
Dunning, David, Detlef Fetchenhauer, & Thomas Schlösser. (2019). Why People Trust: Solved Puzzles and Open Mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28(4). 366–371. 23 indexed citations
6.
Dunning, David, Detlef Fetchenhauer, & Thomas Schlösser. (2017). The varying roles played by emotion in economic decision making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 15. 33–38. 17 indexed citations
7.
Fetchenhauer, Detlef, David Dunning, & Thomas Schlösser. (2017). The Mysteries of Trust. Oxford University Press eBooks.
8.
Kroneberg, Clemens, et al.. (2017). Institutional trust and the provision of public goods: When do individual costs matter? The case of recycling. Rationality and Society. 29(2). 160–178. 22 indexed citations
9.
Schlösser, Thomas, et al.. (2017). How justice sensitivity predicts equality preferences in simulated democratic systems. Journal of Research in Personality. 73. 75–81. 9 indexed citations
10.
Schlösser, Thomas, Sebastian Berger, & Detlef Fetchenhauer. (2017). Justice Sensitivity and Cooperation Dynamics in Repeated Public Good Games. Social Justice Research. 31(1). 1–22. 11 indexed citations
11.
Stavrova, Olga, et al.. (2016). Overfulfilling the Norm. Social Psychology. 47(5). 288–293.
12.
Dunning, David, Joanna E. Anderson, Thomas Schlösser, Daniel Ehlebracht, & Detlef Fetchenhauer. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 107(1). 122–141. 122 indexed citations
13.
Stavrova, Olga, Thomas Schlösser, & Anna Baumert. (2013). Life Satisfaction and Job‐Seeking Behavior of the Unemployed: The Effect of Individual Differences in Justice Sensitivity. Applied Psychology. 63(4). 643–670. 20 indexed citations
14.
Stavrova, Olga, Detlef Fetchenhauer, & Thomas Schlösser. (2012). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research. 42(1). 90–105. 184 indexed citations
15.
Stavrova, Olga, Detlef Fetchenhauer, & Thomas Schlösser. (2011). Cohabitation, Gender, and Happiness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 43(7). 1063–1081. 36 indexed citations
16.
Lotz, Sebastian, et al.. (2011). Individual Differences in Third‐Party Interventions: How Justice Sensitivity Shapes Altruistic Punishment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. 4(4). 297–313. 74 indexed citations
17.
Schlösser, Thomas, David Dunning, & Detlef Fetchenhauer. (2011). What a Feeling: The Role of Immediate and Anticipated Emotions in Risky Decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 26(1). 13–30. 63 indexed citations
18.
Lotz, Sebastian, Tyler G. Okimoto, Thomas Schlösser, & Detlef Fetchenhauer. (2010). Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47(2). 477–480. 109 indexed citations
19.
Lotz, Sebastian, et al.. (2010). Justice Sensitivity, Moral Emotions, and Altruistic Punishment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
20.
Schmitt, Manfred, Anna Baumert, Detlef Fetchenhauer, et al.. (2009). Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit. Psychologische Rundschau. 60(1). 8–22. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026