This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Boone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Boone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Boone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Boone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Boone. The network helps show where Simon Boone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon Boone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon Boone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon Boone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Simon Boone. Simon Boone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boone, Simon, Dimokritos Kavadias, Paul Mahieu, et al.. (2017). Is dat iets voor mij, juf? Leerlingen versterken in het keuzeproces van basis naar secundair. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
Praag, Lore Van, Simon Boone, Peter Stevens, & Mieke Van Houtte. (2013). De paradox van het watervalsysteem: wanneer het groeperen van leerlingen in homogene groepen tot meer heterogeniteit leidt in het beroepsonderwijs. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).
Boone, Simon & Mieke Van Houtte. (2012). Urban: rural differences in educational choice: a matter of local labour market conditions?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
12.
Houtte, Mieke Van & Simon Boone. (2012). The impact of primary schools' socioeconomic composition on social differences in educational choice at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (Belgium). Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
13.
Praag, Lore Van, Simon Boone, Mieke Van Houtte, & Peter Stevens. (2012). Dropping down the cascade system: comparing the educational trajectories and perceptions towards tracking between and within ethnic minority and majority students in Belgium. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
14.
Boone, Simon & Mieke Van Houtte. (2012). Social inequalities in educational choice at the transition from primary to secondary education: a matter of rational calculation?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 91(5). 188–214.7 indexed citations
15.
Praag, Lore Van, Simon Boone, Peter Stevens, & Mieke Van Houtte. (2012). How tracking structures interethnic class group interactions: an ethnographic study of the educational system in Belgium. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
Boone, Simon & Mieke Van Houtte. (2012). Comparative or normative reference groups? The impact of primary school’s socio-economic composition on social differences in educational choice at the transition to secondary education. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
18.
Boone, Simon & Mieke Van Houtte. (2011). Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
Boone, Simon & Mieke Van Houtte. (2010). Sociale ongelijkheid bij de overgang van basis naar secundair onderwijs. Eindrapport van het OBPWO-project 07.03.. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.