Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Work‐home conflict among nurses and engineers: Mediating the impact of role stress on burnout and satisfaction at work
1991513 citationsSamuel B. Bacharach, Sharon Conley et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Conley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Conley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Conley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Conley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Conley. The network helps show where Sharon Conley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon Conley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon Conley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon Conley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon Conley. Sharon Conley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Enomoto, Ernestine K. & Sharon Conley. (2007). Harnessing Technology for School Accountability: A Case Study of Implementing a Management Information System.. Planning and changing. 38. 164–180.5 indexed citations
Conley, Sharon & Ernestine K. Enomoto. (2005). Routines in school organizations. Journal of Educational Administration. 43(1). 9–21.15 indexed citations
9.
Ogawa, Rodney T., Ellen Goldring, & Sharon Conley. (2000). Organizing the Field To Improve Research on Educational Administration.. Educational Administration Quarterly. 36(3).20 indexed citations
10.
Conley, Sharon. (1999). . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 12(4). 305–308.2 indexed citations
11.
Muncey, Donna E. & Sharon Conley. (1999). . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 12(4). 365–385.11 indexed citations
Conley, Sharon. (1991). A Coalitional View of Site-Based Management: Implications for School Administrators in Collective Bargaining Environments.. Planning and changing. 22.1 indexed citations
14.
Lipsky, David B. & Sharon Conley. (1990). Incentive Pay and Collective Bargaining in Public Education. eCommons (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
15.
Conley, Sharon, et al.. (1990). From School-Site Management to Participatory School-Site Management.. Phi Delta Kappan. 71(7).39 indexed citations
16.
Conley, Sharon. (1989). "Who's on First?". Education and Urban Society. 21(4). 366–379.73 indexed citations
17.
Conley, Sharon. (1988). Teacher Participation in Management of School Systems.. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 90(2). 259–280.59 indexed citations
18.
Bacharach, Samuel B. & Sharon Conley. (1986). Education Reform: A Managerial Agenda.. Phi Delta Kappan. 67(9).15 indexed citations
19.
Bacharach, Samuel B., Scott C. Bauer, & Sharon Conley. (1986). Organizational Analysis of Stress. Work and Occupations. 13(1). 7–32.67 indexed citations
20.
Conley, Sharon. (1983). The Relationships Among Expectations, Perceived Job Characteristics and Work Outcomes.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.