Sarah Nixon

18 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Sarah Nixon
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Education 228
  • Information Systems 44
  • Social Psychology 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 35
  • Clinical Psychology 28
Replace Mary Keeffe with:
Mary Keeffe Australia
Emily Hixon United States
Nicoleta Duţă Romania
Dawn Hathaway United States
Kyung Sun Chung United States
Arto K. Ahonen Finland
Stavroula Kaldi Greece
Mathea Simons Belgium
Gregory Reddan Australia
Júlia Griful-Freixenet Belgium
Sarah Nixon relative to Mary Keeffe Australia Mary Keeffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mary Keeffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Nixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Nixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Nixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Nixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Nixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Nixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Nixon. The network helps show where Sarah Nixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Nixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Nixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Nixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Nixon. Sarah Nixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 12
3 23
4 1
5 32
6 0
7 8
8 10
9
CAN A BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH ENHANCE STUDENTS’ TRANSITION INTO HIGHER EDUCATION? A STUDY TO EXPLORE PERCEPTIONS, ENGAGEMENT AND PROGRESSION
7
10 2
11 3
12
The Impact of Social Interaction on Student Learning.
114
13 6
14 6
15 3
16
Tired Of Teaching Observations? A Case Study Of One Approach With A Focus On Communication And Collaboration
0
17 5
18 3
19 55
20
A Descriptive Study of Teachers' Views on Instructional Methods for English as a Second Language Students.
1

About Sarah Nixon

Sarah Nixon is a scholar working on Education, Linguistics and Language and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Practises and Engagement (9 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (228 citations), Computer Science Applications (27 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (7 citations). Sarah Nixon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Beth Hurst, Barbara Walsh, Elizabeth Mitchell, Simon Brooman, Damian Fearon, Rebecca Murphy, Frances Tracy, Elizabeth Mahon, Linda J. Graham and Sally Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Active Learning in Higher Education and Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026