Ruth Pogacar

786 total citations
13 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Ruth Pogacar is a scholar working on Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Pogacar has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Marketing, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth Pogacar's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Ruth Pogacar is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Ruth Pogacar collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Slovenia. Ruth Pogacar's co-authors include Michal Kouril, L. J. Shrum, Tina M. Lowrey, Elanor F. Williams, Mary Steffel, Thomas P. Carpenter, Chris Pullig, Jordan P. LaBouff, Alek Chakroff and Naomi Isenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Marketing and Journal of Marketing Research.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Pogacar

11 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth Pogacar Canada	7	201	150	98	80	69	13	468
Kuangjie Zhang Singapore	7	106 0.5×	165 1.1×	80 0.8×	70 0.9×	106 1.5×	11	358
Lily Jampol United States	4	157 0.8×	183 1.2×	149 1.5×	35 0.4×	53 0.8×	9	406
Danit Ein‐Gar Israel	11	205 1.0×	150 1.0×	117 1.2×	38 0.5×	133 1.9×	23	438
Emily N. Garbinsky United States	11	249 1.2×	254 1.7×	161 1.6×	58 0.7×	77 1.1×	18	529
Priyanka D. Joshi United States	9	148 0.7×	47 0.3×	160 1.6×	140 1.8×	92 1.3×	16	450
Zoë Chance United States	8	131 0.7×	65 0.4×	100 1.0×	75 0.9×	47 0.7×	15	373
Agata Gąsiorowska Poland	14	124 0.6×	118 0.8×	265 2.7×	70 0.9×	94 1.4×	66	599
Jesper H. Nielsen United States	9	147 0.7×	193 1.3×	96 1.0×	54 0.7×	74 1.1×	12	382
Anthony Salerno United States	9	103 0.5×	165 1.1×	168 1.7×	55 0.7×	135 2.0×	17	412
Ian Skurnik United States	6	253 1.3×	102 0.7×	110 1.1×	49 0.6×	65 0.9×	7	477

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Pogacar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Pogacar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Pogacar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Pogacar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Pogacar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Pogacar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Pogacar. The network helps show where Ruth Pogacar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Pogacar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Pogacar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Pogacar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Pogacar. Ruth Pogacar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Mourali, Mehdi, et al.. (2025). Public perception of accuracy-fairness trade-offs in algorithmic decisions in the United States. PLoS ONE. 20(3). e0319861–e0319861.

Mourali, Mehdi, et al.. (2024). Post hoc explanations improve consumer responses to algorithmic decisions. Journal of Business Research. 186. 114981–114981. 4 indexed citations

Hadi, Rhonda, et al.. (2023). Follow your nose when it sounds right: How brand names influence consumer responses to product scents. Journal of Business Research. 157. 113578–113578. 8 indexed citations

Berger, L. L., et al.. (2023). "Tax-Free": The Effect of a Heuristic Cue on the Choice Between a TFSA and an RRSP. 71(1). 1–32.

Pogacar, Ruth, Justin W. Angle, Tina M. Lowrey, L. J. Shrum, & Frank R. Kardes. (2021). Is Nestlé a Lady? The Feminine Brand Name Advantage. Journal of Marketing. 85(6). 101–117. 54 indexed citations

Carpenter, Thomas P., Ruth Pogacar, Chris Pullig, et al.. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods. 51(5). 2194–2208. 195 indexed citations

Pogacar, Ruth, Michal Kouril, Thomas P. Carpenter, & James J. Kellaris. (2018). Implicit and explicit preferences for brand name sounds. Marketing Letters. 29(2). 241–259. 16 indexed citations

Pogacar, Ruth, L. J. Shrum, & Tina M. Lowrey. (2018). The Effects of Linguistic Devices on Consumer Information Processing and Persuasion: A Language Complexity × Processing Mode Framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 28(4). 689–711. 66 indexed citations

Moorthy, Sridhar, et al.. (2018). Is Nike female? Exploring the role of sound symbolism in predicting brand name gender. 1128–1132. 3 indexed citations

10.

Pogacar, Ruth, et al.. (2017). Sound symbolism in translation. Translation and Interpreting Studies. 12(1). 137–161. 3 indexed citations

11.

Steffel, Mary, Elanor F. Williams, & Ruth Pogacar. (2016). Ethically Deployed Defaults: Transparency and Consumer Protection through Disclosure and Preference Articulation. Journal of Marketing Research. 53(5). 865–880. 92 indexed citations

12.

Pogacar, Ruth, et al.. (2014). Do Defaults Work When They’Re Disclosed? Effectiveness and Perceived Ethicality of Disclosed Defaults. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations

13.

Pogacar, Ruth, et al.. (2014). Sounds good: Phonetic sound patterns in top brand names. Marketing Letters. 26(4). 549–563. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact