Tina M. Lowrey

4.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
65 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Tina M. Lowrey is a scholar working on Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina M. Lowrey has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Marketing, 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tina M. Lowrey's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (26 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers). Tina M. Lowrey is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (26 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers). Tina M. Lowrey collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Tina M. Lowrey's co-authors include L. J. Shrum, Cele C. Otnes, John A. McCarty, Sharon Shavitt, Young Chan Kim, Élodie Gentina, Sangpil Han, Lan Nguyen Chaplin, Ruth Pogacar and Stacey Baxter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Marketing and Journal of Consumer Research.

In The Last Decade

Tina M. Lowrey

63 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and Their Imp... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tina M. Lowrey United States 27 2.1k 1.1k 523 429 415 65 3.2k
Jennifer Argo Canada 32 2.3k 1.1× 1.6k 1.4× 876 1.7× 403 0.9× 174 0.4× 65 3.7k
Kim K. P. Johnson United States 32 2.2k 1.1× 1.3k 1.2× 371 0.7× 222 0.5× 239 0.6× 158 3.7k
James E. Burroughs United States 16 1.7k 0.8× 974 0.9× 927 1.8× 312 0.7× 126 0.3× 29 3.0k
Laura A. Peracchio United States 33 2.3k 1.1× 1.4k 1.2× 871 1.7× 496 1.2× 122 0.3× 75 4.2k
Mario Pandelaere Belgium 28 1.4k 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 794 1.5× 369 0.9× 283 0.7× 105 2.9k
Chun‐Tuan Chang Taiwan 25 1.2k 0.6× 1.5k 1.3× 440 0.8× 220 0.5× 210 0.5× 63 2.7k
Scott Dawson United States 13 2.2k 1.1× 979 0.9× 756 1.4× 295 0.7× 148 0.4× 21 3.4k
David M. Hardesty United States 27 2.2k 1.1× 1.4k 1.2× 698 1.3× 210 0.5× 212 0.5× 49 4.0k
Katherine White Canada 22 1.3k 0.6× 1.1k 1.0× 996 1.9× 379 0.9× 288 0.7× 41 3.7k
Felix Septianto Australia 28 1.4k 0.7× 1.2k 1.1× 490 0.9× 160 0.4× 194 0.5× 127 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Tina M. Lowrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina M. Lowrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina M. Lowrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina M. Lowrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina M. Lowrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina M. Lowrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina M. Lowrey. The network helps show where Tina M. Lowrey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina M. Lowrey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina M. Lowrey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina M. Lowrey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina M. Lowrey. Tina M. Lowrey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lowrey, Tina M., et al.. (2022). Grammatical gender and anthropomorphism: “It” depends on the language.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 123(3). 503–517. 4 indexed citations
2.
Shrum, L. J., et al.. (2021). COVID‐19 is Feminine: Grammatical Gender Influences Danger Perceptions and Precautionary Behavioral Intentions by Activating Gender Stereotypes. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 32(2). 316–325. 16 indexed citations
3.
Massiah, Carolyn, et al.. (2020). Nonmonetary and nonreciprocal freecycling: Motivations for participating in online alternative giving communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 19(4). 339–350. 8 indexed citations
4.
Lowrey, Tina M., et al.. (2018). Linguistic Antecedents of Anthropomorphism. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
5.
Baxter, Stacey, Jasmina Ilicic, Alicia Kulczynski, & Tina M. Lowrey. (2017). Using sublexical priming to enhance brand name phonetic symbolism effects in young children. Marketing Letters. 28(4). 565–577. 7 indexed citations
6.
Gentina, Élodie, L. J. Shrum, & Tina M. Lowrey. (2015). A Social Network Analysis of Adolescent Social Standing, Sharing and Acquisition Materialism, and Happiness. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations
7.
Klein, Jill G., Tina M. Lowrey, & Cele C. Otnes. (2015). Identity‐based motivations and anticipated reckoning: Contributions to gift‐giving theory from an identity‐stripping context. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 25(3). 431–448. 33 indexed citations
8.
McCarty, John A. & Tina M. Lowrey. (2012). Product Integration: Current Practices and New Directions. 29–54. 5 indexed citations
9.
Klein, Jill G. & Tina M. Lowrey. (2006). Giving and Receiving Humanity: Gifts Among Prisoners in Nazi Concentration Camps. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (2006). The Relation Between Script Complexity and Commercial Memorability. Journal of Advertising. 35(3). 7–15. 38 indexed citations
11.
Lowrey, Tina M., Cele C. Otnes, & Mary Ann McGrath. (2005). Shopping with consumers: reflections and innovations. Qualitative Market Research An International Journal. 8(2). 176–188. 34 indexed citations
12.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1998). The Effects of Syntactic Complexity on Advertising Persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 7(2). 187–206. 103 indexed citations
13.
Shrum, L. J., John A. McCarty, & Tina M. Lowrey. (1995). Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and Their Implications for Advertising Strategy. Journal of Advertising. 24(2). 71–82. 507 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Otnes, Cele C., et al.. (1994). In-Laws and Outlaws: the Impact of Divorce and Remarriage Upon Christmas Gift Exchange. ACR North American Advances. 21(1). 25–29. 6 indexed citations
15.
Otnes, Cele C. & Tina M. Lowrey. (1993). 'Til Debt Do Us Part: the Selection and Meaning of Artifacts in the American Wedding. ACR North American Advances. 20(1). 325–329. 24 indexed citations
16.
Otnes, Cele C., Young Chan Kim, & Tina M. Lowrey. (1992). Ho, Ho, Woe: Christmas Shopping For QDifficultQ People. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
17.
Shavitt, Sharon & Tina M. Lowrey. (1992). Attitude Functions in Advertising Effectiveness: the Interactive Role of Product Type and Personality Type. ACR North American Advances. 4 indexed citations
18.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1992). The Relation Between Syntactic Complexity and Advertising Persuasiveness. ACR North American Advances. 6 indexed citations
19.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1991). The Use of Diffusion Theory in Marketing: a Qualitative Approach to Innovative Consumer Behavior. ACR North American Advances. 15 indexed citations
20.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1989). Research in Consumer Complaining and Word-Of-Mouth Activities Discussant's Comments. ACR North American Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026