Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and Their Implications for Advertising Strategy
1995507 citationsL. J. Shrum, John A. McCarty et al.Journal of Advertisingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Tina M. Lowrey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina M. Lowrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina M. Lowrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina M. Lowrey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina M. Lowrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina M. Lowrey. The network helps show where Tina M. Lowrey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina M. Lowrey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina M. Lowrey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina M. Lowrey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tina M. Lowrey. Tina M. Lowrey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gentina, Élodie, L. J. Shrum, & Tina M. Lowrey. (2015). A Social Network Analysis of Adolescent Social Standing, Sharing and Acquisition Materialism, and Happiness. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
Klein, Jill G. & Tina M. Lowrey. (2006). Giving and Receiving Humanity: Gifts Among Prisoners in Nazi Concentration Camps. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Shrum, L. J., John A. McCarty, & Tina M. Lowrey. (1995). Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and Their Implications for Advertising Strategy. Journal of Advertising. 24(2). 71–82.507 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Otnes, Cele C., et al.. (1994). In-Laws and Outlaws: the Impact of Divorce and Remarriage Upon Christmas Gift Exchange. ACR North American Advances. 21(1). 25–29.6 indexed citations
15.
Otnes, Cele C. & Tina M. Lowrey. (1993). 'Til Debt Do Us Part: the Selection and Meaning of Artifacts in the American Wedding. ACR North American Advances. 20(1). 325–329.24 indexed citations
16.
Otnes, Cele C., Young Chan Kim, & Tina M. Lowrey. (1992). Ho, Ho, Woe: Christmas Shopping For QDifficultQ People. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
17.
Shavitt, Sharon & Tina M. Lowrey. (1992). Attitude Functions in Advertising Effectiveness: the Interactive Role of Product Type and Personality Type. ACR North American Advances.4 indexed citations
18.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1992). The Relation Between Syntactic Complexity and Advertising Persuasiveness. ACR North American Advances.6 indexed citations
19.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1991). The Use of Diffusion Theory in Marketing: a Qualitative Approach to Innovative Consumer Behavior. ACR North American Advances.15 indexed citations
20.
Lowrey, Tina M.. (1989). Research in Consumer Complaining and Word-Of-Mouth Activities Discussant's Comments. ACR North American Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.