Mary Steffel

1.1k total citations
25 papers, 668 citations indexed

About

Mary Steffel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Steffel has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 668 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in General Decision Sciences and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mary Steffel's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers). Mary Steffel is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers). Mary Steffel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Mary Steffel's co-authors include Elanor F. Williams, Elanor F. Williams, Nicholas Epley, Tal Eyal, Ruth Pogacar, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, David Tannenbaum, Emily Pronin, Michael I. Norton and Tom Baker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Consumer Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary Steffel

23 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Steffel United States 13 251 177 154 113 112 25 668
Irene Scopelliti United Kingdom 10 183 0.7× 158 0.9× 153 1.0× 126 1.1× 105 0.9× 26 724
Arul Mishra United States 13 180 0.7× 113 0.6× 192 1.2× 65 0.6× 78 0.7× 35 553
Hannah H. Chang Singapore 8 252 1.0× 190 1.1× 255 1.7× 242 2.1× 226 2.0× 13 795
Mark V. Pezzo United States 13 279 1.1× 158 0.9× 86 0.6× 241 2.1× 82 0.7× 19 841
Minjung Koo United States 10 316 1.3× 260 1.5× 243 1.6× 89 0.8× 346 3.1× 19 799
Liat Hadar United States 11 132 0.5× 71 0.4× 119 0.8× 340 3.0× 113 1.0× 19 743
Jane Ebert United States 9 143 0.6× 124 0.7× 117 0.8× 254 2.2× 172 1.5× 15 647
Susanne Haberstroh Germany 8 128 0.5× 150 0.8× 37 0.2× 86 0.8× 87 0.8× 14 441
Jonathan M. Meyers United States 3 269 1.1× 264 1.5× 80 0.5× 307 2.7× 287 2.6× 3 828
Michael Schaerer Singapore 15 337 1.3× 232 1.3× 31 0.2× 44 0.4× 51 0.5× 29 640

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Steffel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Steffel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Steffel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Steffel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Steffel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Steffel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Steffel. The network helps show where Mary Steffel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Steffel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Steffel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Steffel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Steffel. Mary Steffel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2023). The downside of decision delegation: When transferring decision responsibility incurs interpersonal costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 176. 104251–104251. 3 indexed citations
3.
Steffel, Mary & Elanor F. Williams. (2021). Do Our Choices Tell Us Who We Are? It Depends on How Easy or Difficult They Were to Make. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 31(4). 784–791. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kappes, Heather Barry, Rebecca Johnson, Jessica Leight, et al.. (2021). Lessons for Covid-19 Vaccination from Eight Federal Government Direct Communication Evaluations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2021). Empowering Consumers to Engage with Health Decisions: Making Medical Choices Feel Easy Increases Patient Participation. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 7(2). 154–163. 2 indexed citations
6.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2021). Buying gifts for multiple recipients: How culture affects whose desires are prioritized. Journal of Business Research. 132. 10–20. 12 indexed citations
7.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2021). Consumers Value Effort over Ease When Caring for Close Others. Journal of Consumer Research. 48(6). 970–990. 22 indexed citations
8.
Dellaert, Benedict G. C., Suzanne B. Shu, Theo Arentze, et al.. (2020). Consumer decisions with artificially intelligent voice assistants. Marketing Letters. 31(4). 335–347. 76 indexed citations
9.
Steffel, Mary, Elanor F. Williams, & David Tannenbaum. (2019). Does changing defaults save lives? Effects of presumed consent organ donation policies. Behavioral Science & Policy. 5(1). 68–88. 18 indexed citations
10.
Eyal, Tal, Mary Steffel, & Nicholas Epley. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 114(4). 547–571. 141 indexed citations
11.
Steffel, Mary & Elanor F. Williams. (2017). Delegating Decisions: Recruiting Others to Make Choices We Might Regret. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
12.
Steffel, Mary & Elanor F. Williams. (2017). Delegating Decisions: Recruiting Others to Make Choices We Might Regret. Journal of Consumer Research. 44(5). 1015–1032. 56 indexed citations
13.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2016). Passing the buck: Delegating choices to others to avoid responsibility and blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 135. 32–44. 63 indexed citations
14.
Steffel, Mary, Elanor F. Williams, & Ruth Pogacar. (2016). Ethically Deployed Defaults: Transparency and Consumer Protection through Disclosure and Preference Articulation. Journal of Marketing Research. 53(5). 865–880. 92 indexed citations
15.
Steffel, Mary, Elanor F. Williams, & Robyn A. LeBoeuf. (2015). Overly Specific Gift Giving: Givers Choose Personalized But Less-Versatile and Less-Preferred Gifts. ACR North American Advances. 4 indexed citations
16.
Pogacar, Ruth, et al.. (2014). Do Defaults Work When They’Re Disclosed? Effectiveness and Perceived Ethicality of Disclosed Defaults. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations
17.
Steffel, Mary, et al.. (2013). Overindividuation in Gift Giving: Shopping for Multiple Recipients Leads Givers to Choose Unique but Less Preferred Gifts. Journal of Consumer Research. 40(6). 1167–1180. 71 indexed citations
18.
Pronin, Emily, et al.. (2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95(4). 795–809. 17 indexed citations
19.
Steffel, Mary & Daniel M. Oppenheimer. (2008). Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness. Social Indicators Research. 92(1). 69–79. 17 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Eric J., Mary Steffel, & Daniel G. Goldstein. (2005). Making better decisions: From measuring to constructing preferences.. Health Psychology. 24(4, Suppl). S17–S22. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026