Countries citing papers authored by Dirk Smeesters
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk Smeesters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk Smeesters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk Smeesters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk Smeesters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk Smeesters. The network helps show where Dirk Smeesters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dirk Smeesters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dirk Smeesters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dirk Smeesters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dirk Smeesters. Dirk Smeesters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fransen, Marieke L., Dirk Smeesters, & Bob M. Fennis. (2010). Mortality Salience and Brand Attitudes: the Moderating Role of Social Presence. Advances in consumer research. 37. 534–535.1 indexed citations
3.
Fernandes, Daniel Silva, Naomi Mandel, & Dirk Smeesters. (2010). The Spice of Life: Effects of Mortality Anxiety on Preference For Variety. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Liu, Jia, Els Gijsbrechts, & Dirk Smeesters. (2009). Why ‘Fast Food’ Triggers ‘Mcdonald’S’ and ‘Burgerking’ Triggers ‘Fast Food’: Antecedents of Brand Typicality and the Relationship Between Category and Brand. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
6.
Smeesters, Dirk, et al.. (2009). “Still Preoccupied With 1985: the Effect of Imagined Interaction on Preference For Nostalgic Products”. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
7.
Wan, Fang, et al.. (2009). Contrast Or Assimilation Effect As a Result of Upward Social Comparison With Idealized Images: the Role of Mode of Exposure and Priming. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Smeesters, Dirk, Thomas Mussweiler, & Naomi Mandel. (2008). The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
10.
Mandel, Naomi & Dirk Smeesters. (2008). The Sweet Escape: Effects of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantities for High- and Low-Self-Esteem Consumers. EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam).1 indexed citations
Mandel, Naomi & Dirk Smeesters. (2007). Shop ‘Til You Drop: the Effect of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantity. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Smeesters, Dirk, et al.. (2003). About prisoners and dictators: the role of other-self focus, social value orientation, and sterotype primes in shaping cooperative behavior. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Smeesters, Dirk, Luk Warlop, & Eddy Van Avermaet. (2002). Exploring the role of consistency of social value orientations : temporal stability, reciprocal cooperation, and forgiveness. Lirias (KU Leuven).5 indexed citations
19.
Warlop, Luk, Dirk Smeesters, & Piet Vanden Abeele. (2001). On selling brotherhood like soap: Influencing every day disposal decisions. Lirias (KU Leuven). 197–215.4 indexed citations
20.
Smeesters, Dirk, et al.. (1999). Exploring the recycling dilemma: consumer motivation and experiences in mandatory garbage recycling programs. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1–18.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.