Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice
2017222 citationsDanah Henriksen, Rohit Mehta et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rohit Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rohit Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rohit Mehta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rohit Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rohit Mehta. The network helps show where Rohit Mehta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rohit Mehta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rohit Mehta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rohit Mehta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rohit Mehta. Rohit Mehta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mehta, Rohit, Danah Henriksen, & Joshua M. Rosenberg. (2019). It's Not about the Tools.. Educational leadership. 76(5). 64–69.3 indexed citations
8.
Shah, Mamta, Kevin J. Graziano, Denise A. Schmidt-Crawford, et al.. (2018). Multiple Perspectives on Strengthening the Ability of Teacher Education Programs to Prepare Teacher Candidates to Integrate Technology. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2041–2046.1 indexed citations
Mehta, Rohit, et al.. (2017). Curriculum and Practice of an Innovative Teacher Professional Development Program.. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 36(3). 237–254.1 indexed citations
12.
Mehta, Rohit, et al.. (2017). A Holistic Approach to Science Education: Disciplinary, Affective, and Equitable. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 36(3). 269–286.1 indexed citations
Mehta, Rohit & Punya Mishra. (2016). Switching Between Reading Stances:Intertextuality and Comprehension in Multimodal Texts. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2016(1). 1604–1610.
Henriksen, Danah, Punya Mishra, & Rohit Mehta. (2015). Novel, Effective, Whole: Toward a NEW Framework for Evaluations of Creative Products. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 23(3). 455–478.16 indexed citations
Mehta, Rohit. (1995). From mind to super-mind.1 indexed citations
20.
Mehta, Rohit. (1966). From mind to super-mind : a commentary of the Bhagavad Gita.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.