Sarah Proctor-Thomson
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Demography top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ken ParryGeoff PlimmerCarolyn CorderyKaren SmithJane ParkerStephen CummingsBrad JacksonSuze Wilson
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementPublic AdministrationInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- New ZealandRussiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sarah Proctor-Thomson
16 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 270
- Sociology and Political Science 162
- Strategy and Management 122
- Social Psychology 80
- Demography 79
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Proctor-Thomson
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Proctor-Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Proctor-Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Proctor-Thomson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Proctor-Thomson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Proctor-Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Proctor-Thomson. The network helps show where Sarah Proctor-Thomson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Proctor-Thomson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Proctor-Thomson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Proctor-Thomson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Proctor-Thomson. Sarah Proctor-Thomson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The state of the public tertiary education sector survey | 4 |
| 4 | Revitalising Leadership: Putting Theory and Practice into Context | 9 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 153 | |
| 16 | 177 | |
| 17 | Testing the validity and reliability of the organisational Description Questionnaire (QDQ) | 4 |
About Sarah Proctor-Thomson
Sarah Proctor-Thomson is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (270 citations), Public Administration (40 citations) and Information Systems and Management (62 citations). Sarah Proctor-Thomson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ken Parry, Geoff Plimmer, Carolyn Cordery, Karen Smith, Jane Parker, Stephen Cummings, Brad Jackson and Suze Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Management Learning and New Technology Work and Employment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.