Philip Ice

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Philip Ice is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Ice has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Philip Ice's work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers). Philip Ice is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers). Philip Ice collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Philip Ice's co-authors include Karen Swan, Martha Cleveland‐Innes, D. Randy Garrison, Jennifer Richardson, J. B. Arbaugh, Sebastián Díaz, Lori Kupczynski, Reagan Curtis, John G. Wells and Angela M. Gibson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Internet and Higher Education and First Monday.

In The Last Decade

Philip Ice

9 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a m... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Ice United States 7 1.0k 632 433 126 123 10 1.2k
Phil Ice United States 16 739 0.7× 374 0.6× 331 0.8× 77 0.6× 114 0.9× 33 877
Alexandra Pickett United States 11 1.2k 1.2× 540 0.9× 370 0.9× 120 1.0× 208 1.7× 16 1.4k
Selma Vonderwell United States 8 815 0.8× 352 0.6× 214 0.5× 83 0.7× 103 0.8× 12 982
Valerie Osland Paton United States 8 886 0.9× 721 1.1× 397 0.9× 217 1.7× 117 1.0× 22 1.2k
Mauri Collins United States 6 655 0.6× 437 0.7× 201 0.5× 85 0.7× 98 0.8× 15 886
Martin Graff United Kingdom 12 517 0.5× 287 0.5× 231 0.5× 99 0.8× 50 0.4× 26 788
Tim Roberts Australia 11 507 0.5× 334 0.5× 182 0.4× 62 0.5× 89 0.7× 33 839
Ayesha Sadaf United States 15 825 0.8× 236 0.4× 188 0.4× 164 1.3× 101 0.8× 32 1.1k
Youngju Lee United States 9 780 0.8× 286 0.5× 299 0.7× 106 0.8× 96 0.8× 23 1.1k
Elmar Stahl Germany 13 791 0.8× 1.0k 1.6× 175 0.4× 142 1.1× 66 0.5× 23 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Ice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Ice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Ice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Ice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Ice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Ice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Ice. The network helps show where Philip Ice may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Ice

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Ice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Ice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Ice. Philip Ice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Ice, Philip, et al.. (2019). USING ASYNCHRONOUS AUDIO FEEDBACK TO ENHANCE TEACHING PRESENCE AND STUDENTS’ SENSE OF COMMUNITY. Online Learning. 11(2). 3–25. 80 indexed citations
3.
Ice, Philip, et al.. (2011). An Exploration of Differences Among Community of Inquiry Indicators in Low and High Disenrollment Online Courses. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(2). 22 indexed citations
4.
Díaz, Sebastián, Karen Swan, Philip Ice, & Lori Kupczynski. (2009). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education. 13(1-2). 22–30. 98 indexed citations
5.
Ice, Philip, et al.. (2008). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of group and individualized feedback in online courses. First Monday. 8 indexed citations
6.
Arbaugh, J. B., Martha Cleveland‐Innes, Sebastián Díaz, et al.. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education. 11(3-4). 133–136. 676 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Swan, Kenneth C., J. B. Arbaugh, Martha Cleveland‐Innes, et al.. (2008). The community of inquiry framework : Development, validation, and directions for further research.
8.
Swan, Karen, Jennifer Richardson, Philip Ice, et al.. (2008). Researching Online Communities of Inquiry: New CoI Survey Instrument. 2008(1). 5812–5820. 4 indexed citations
9.
Garrison, D. Randy, J. B. Arbaugh, Martha Cleveland‐Innes, et al.. (2008). Community of inquiry framework : Instrument development, validation and application. 2 indexed citations
10.
Swan, Karen, Jennifer Richardson, Philip Ice, et al.. (2008). Validating a Measurement Tool of Presen ce in Online Communities of Inquiry. 2(24). 88–94. 250 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026